help button home button The Oncologist http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/misc/eLetters.shtml
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiou, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiou, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, T. J.
The Oncologist, Vol. 5, No. 2, 120-135, April 2000
© 2000 AlphaMed Press

New Drugs and Novel Targets for Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Cancer

Christine C. Chiou, Andreas H. Groll, Thomas J. Walsh

National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Correspondence: Thomas J. Walsh, M.D., Immunocompromised Host Section, Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bldg. 10, Rm. 13N240, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. Telephone: 301-402-0023; Fax: 301-402-0575; e-mail: walsht{at}pbmac.nci.nih.gov


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Recombinant Human Cytokines in...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Invasive fungal infections have emerged as important causes of morbidity and mortality in profoundly immunocompromised patients with cancer. Current treatment strategies for these infections are limited by antifungal resistance, toxicity, drug interactions, and expense.

In order to overcome these limitations, new antifungal compounds are being developed, which may improve our therapeutic armamentarium for prevention and treatment of invasive mycoses in high-risk patitnts with neoplastic diseases.

Key Words. Triazoles • Voriconazole • Posaconazole • Ravuconazole • Echinocondins


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Recombinant Human Cytokines in...
 Conclusions
 References
 
The incidence of both mucosal and invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients has increased steadily over the past two decades [1]. Apart from organ transplant recipients, individuals with AIDS, and patients hospitalized with severe illnesses, major increases in invasive fungal infections have been observed in patients with hematologic malignancies who receive induction or consolidation chemotherapy and those who undergo bone marrow transplantation (BMT) [2-6].

Candida albicans and Aspergillus spp. account for most of the invasive infections in the neutropenic cancer patient. However, non-albicans Candida spp. and previously uncommon opportunistic fungal pathogens such as Fusarium spp., zygomycetes, and dematiaceous molds are observed with increasing frequency in this population [2, 7-9] (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Fungal pathogens in cancer patients
 
For many years, the treatment of most invasive fungal infections was essentially limited to amphotericin B (AmB) with or without 5-flucytosine (5-FC). Therapeutic options did not expand until the late 1980s, when fluconazole and itraconazole were introduced (Table 2Go). Triggered by the increasing number of neutropenic patients and patients with AIDS, the past decade, however, has seen a major expansion in antifungal drug research. These efforts have resulted in the development of novel lipid-based formulations of AmB and the discovery or design of several new antifungal compounds that are currently at various stages of clinical investigation (Table 3Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Systemic antifungal agents in clinical use
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Current investigational systemic antifugal agents
 
This article reviews the current developmental agents for systemic treatment of fungal infections: the advanced-generation antifungal triazoles; novel cell-wall inhibitors such as echinocandins and nikkomycin; pradimicins; sordarins; and the unilamellar form of liposomal nystatin, the first antifungal polyene discovered in the early 1950s. The lipid formulations of AmB, which have been comprehensively reviewed [10-12], will not be considered in this article.


    Antifungal Compounds Targeting Cell Membrane
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Recombinant Human Cytokines in...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Antifungal Triazoles
The azole antifungal agents in clinical use for systemic treatment contain either two or three nitrogens in the azole ring and thereby are classified as imidazoles (ketoconazole and miconazole) or triazoles (itraconazole and fluconazole), respectively. Azole antifungal agents inhibit the synthesis of ergosterol, the major sterol component in the fungal plasma membrane, by interfering with the cytochrome p-450-dependent enzyme lanosterol demethylase.

Fluconazole has proved to be an effective agent for mucosal forms of candidiasis in neutropenic patients [13] and it is as effective as AmB in the treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic individuals, but better tolerated [14, 15]. In the neutropenic hosts, fluconazole can be used for the treatment of invasive Candida infection caused by susceptible organisms in patients who are stable and who have not been pretreated with an azole agent [16-18]. Fluconazole also can be effective in patients with chronic disseminated candidiasis [19, 20]. Fluconazole is not clinically indicated for treatment of Candida krusei and some Candida glabrata infections and it is ineffective against opportunistic filamentous fungi [21]. Apart from inherited resistance, acquired resistance to fluconazole has been increasingly observed in patients with HIV infection and oropharyngeal candidiasis. In addition, breakthrough fungemia due to resistant C. albicans has been reported recently in BMT patients [22-24]. C. glabrata may also acquire resistance to fluconazole and may cause breakthrough infection.

Fluconazole is generally well tolerated at the usual dosage range of 100-400 mg/day and even at doses of up to 1,200 mg/day. Nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal symptoms are reported in less than 5%, skin rash and headaches in less than 2%, and usually reversible, asymptomatic elevations of hepatic transaminases in 7% of adult patients.

In contrast to fluconazole, which is only active against yeasts, itraconazole has clinically useful activity against filamentous fungi [25]. In an open clinical trial investigating treatment for invasive aspergillosis performed by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group, a full or partial response was observed in 8 (61%) of 13 neutropenic patients and 3 (38%) of 8 BMT recipients [26]. These rates were similar to those usually obtained for AmB treatment [27]. Low blood levels of itraconazole were detected in some individuals who failed treatment. This problem has been frequently observed in neutropenic cancer and BMT patients receiving the drug for prophylaxis, and it is associated with poor absorption after oral administration [28, 29]. Microbiological and clinical resistance of Aspergillus spp. to itraconazole may occur. For example, in a recent report, two strains of Aspergillus fumigatus isolated from patients who failed to respond to treatment with itraconazole had relatively high mean inhibitory concentrations (MICs), and also showed no susceptibility to itraconzaole when tested in a neutropenic mouse model of invasive aspergillosis [30].

The frequency of side effects of itraconazole in the capsule formulation is relatively low and includes nausea and vomiting (<10 %), elevated transaminases (5%), skin rash and/or pruritus (2%), and headache and dizziness (<2%). A definite impediment to itraconazole treatment is its erratic oral absorption. An intravenous formulation is in the advanced stage of clinical development. The cyclodextrin oral solution improves bioavailability but may cause gastrointestinal symptoms at higher dosages (>5 mg/kg/day). Itraconazole carries the potential for interfering with the cytochrome p450 enzyme system, which leads to a number of significant drug-drug interactions, including cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, and vincristine, drugs that are often used in cancer patients [31]. Several drugs are contraindicated in combination with itraconazole; such agents share metabolism through cytochrome p450 3A4 pathway. These include terfenidine, astemizole, cisapride, midazolam, and triazolam. The former three compounds have been associated with ventricular arrhythmias when combined with itraconazole. The two benzodiazepenes may achieve elevated and sustained plasma concentrations, resulting in respiratory depression.

The continuing demand for safe and effective broad-spectrum antifungal agents with favorable pharmacokinetic properties has spurred both the design and development of new antifungal triazoles for systemic use. Among these are voriconazole (UK 109496), posaconazole (Sch 56592), and ravuconazole (BMS-207147). While voriconazole and ravuconazole are structurally closely related to fluconazole, the structure of posaconazole is very similar to that of itraconazole. Each of these new agents is active following oral administration; voriconazole is also available in a parenteral formulation.

Voriconazole (formerly UK 109496)
Voriconazole is a new triazole antifungal agent that is derived from the structure of fluconazole, having one triazole moiety replaced by a fluropyrimidine grouping, and a methyl group added to the propanol backbone (Fig. 1Go). These structural changes result in increased activity at the target enzyme lanosterol demethylase and an enhanced antifungal spectrum that includes filamentous fungi. Voriconazole is orally and parenterally active.





View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. New triazoles. (A) Voriconazole (UK 109496); (B) posaconazole (Sch 56592); (C) ravuconazole (BMS-207147).

 

In Vitro Activity
Voriconazole exhibits a wide spectrum of activity against clinically important fungal pathogens such as Candida spp. [32-34]; Aspergillus spp. [35, 36]; Cryptococcus neoformans [37]; dimorphic fungi such as Histoplasma capsulatum, Blastomyces dermatitidis, Coccidioides immitis, Penicillium marneffei; emerging pathogens such as Fusarium spp. and other hyalohyphomycetes; and some of the dematiaceous molds [38, 39].

Compared to reference agents, on a milligram-tomilligram basis, voriconazole was 4- to 16-fold more active than fluconazole and two- to eightfold more active than itraconazole against Candida spp., including C. krusei and C. glabrata [37, 40]. However, for isolates of Candida spp. with decreased susceptibility to fluconazole and itraconazole, MICs of voriconazole were also higher [33]. Of note, voriconazole was more active than AmB or 5-FC against all species of Candida except for C. glabrata [33]. The compound was active against both fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant strains of C. neoformans. However, higher MICs were observed in the few fluconazole-resistant strains, suggesting cross-resistance [41]. Noteworthy was the high activity of voriconazole in vitro against A. fumigatus (mean MIC = 0.23 µg/ml), exceeding that of itraconazole [42, 43].

Experimental Animal Models of Invasive Fungal Diseases
Voriconazole was as effective as fluconazole and itraconazole in experimental systemic candidiasis in both non-neutropenic and neutropenic guinea pigs and had clinical activity in animals infected by fluconazole-resistant strains of C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. glabrata where fluconazole was inactive [44]. This compound had activity superior to that of AmB and itraconazole in experimental disseminated aspergillosis in neutropenic guinea pigs, and was more efficacious than itraconazole in experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in immunocompromised guinea pigs [45]. Similar findings were noted in temporarily neutropenic rabbits and in steroid-treated rats [36, 46]. Thus voriconazole prolonged survival and reduced organism burden in infected tissue in several models [47]. In addition, voriconazole was highly efficacious in both the prophylaxis and treatment of experimental left-sided Aspergillus endocarditis in the guinea pig [48]. Voriconazole had efficacy comparable to that of fluconazole and itraconazole in experimental pulmonary and meningocerebral cryptococcosis in the guinea pig [49].

Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution
Voriconazole displays nonlinear plasma pharmacokinetics [50]. In human volunteers, peak plasma levels are attained within 2 h after oral dosing. Bioavailability is up to 90% depending on the dose. Plasma protein binding in humans is approximately 65%. The drug is extensively metabolized: 78%-88% of a single dose appears in the urine but less than 5% is unchanged compound. The elimination half-life is approximately 6 h. Multiple dosing leads to reduced systemic clearance and up to eightfold accumulation. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state of 2 l/kg suggests widespread distribution throughout the body [51, 52]. It is of interest that animal studies revealed good penetration into the central nervous system (CNS) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [53]. In the guinea pig model, steady-state concentrations of voriconazole in CSF were approximately 50% of the concurrent concentrations in plasma, whereas those in CNS tissues were approximately twofold higher.

Clinical Studies
Data from phase II clinical trials indicate that voriconazole is a promising new agent for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis, esophageal candidiasis, and acute and chronic invasive aspergillosis [40, 54-56]. Even in severe CD4 lymphocyte-depleted patients with end-stage AIDS who had fluconazole-refractory candidiasis, switching to voriconazole was effective in the majority of patients [57]. Voriconazole has been reported to successfully treat disseminated Scedosporium infection in a neutropenic patient and a case of cerebral aspergillosis, an infection in which the mortality is exceedingly high [58, 59]. The therapeutic activity of voriconazole in acute and chronic invasive aspergillosis was evaluated in open, noncomparative studies [54-56]. Immunocompromised patients with acute invasive aspergillosis, 72% of whom had not responded to prior therapy with AmB or itraconazole, received voriconazole in different dosages. An interim analysis of data for 53 of 71 evaluable patients showed that treatment with voriconazole resulted in a favorable clinical response in 29 patients (74%). Non-neutropenic patients with chronic invasive aspergillosis, approximately 50% of whom had failed to respond to prior treatment with either amphotericin or itraconazole, were treated with voriconazole 200 mg p.o. twice daily for 4 to 24 weeks. At interim analysis, voriconazole achieved a favorable clinical response in 9 (69%) of 13 evaluable patients.

Two phase III clinical trials comparing voriconazole with established agents are in progress: treatment of invasive aspergillosis (voriconazole versus AmB) and empirical antifungal therapy in persistently febrile neutropenic patients (voriconazole versus liposomal AmB).

Side effects of voriconazole include elevated hepatic transaminases in 10%-15% of patients, skin rash in 1%-5%, and transient visual disturbances in 10%-15%, which in animal models had no morphological correlates. This compound otherwise appears to be safe.

Posaconazole (Sch 56592)
Posaconazole is a hydroxylated analog of itraconazole (Fig. 1Go). Compared with itraconazole and similar to voriconazole, it has potent activity toward a variety of medically important fungi. Sch 56592 is available as an oral formulation.

In Vitro Activity
Posaconazole possesses potent broad-spectrum activity against opportunistic and endemic fungal pathogens. These include Candida spp. [34, 60, 61], C. neoformans [62, 63], Aspergillus spp. [64], Trichosporon beigelii [65], other less common, filamentous fungi, including zygomycetes, Fusarium spp., and some of the dematiaceous molds [65]. Compared with currently available triazoles, the activity of posaconazole is similar to that of itraconazole and at least eightfold greater than that of fluconazole against Candida spp. However, similar to that which has been observed in voriconazole, higher MICs were observed among Candida strains that were resistant to fluconazole. Most notably, the drug is highly active against Aspergillus spp., with geometric mean MICs approximately 3- and 20-fold lower than those of itraconazole and AmB, on a milligram-to-milligram basis [64].

Experimental Animal Models of Invasive Fungal Diseases
Posaconazole has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in a number of animal models of fungal infections, including vaginal, oropharyngeal, and systemic candidiasis, systemic and pulmonary aspergillosis, cryptococcal meningitis, disseminated histoplasmosis, and coccidiodomycosis [47]. Posaconazole was superior to fluconazole or itraconazole or both in dermatophytoses, vaginal and gastrointestinal candidiasis, and systemic candidiasis [66-69]. Posaconazole prolonged survival and reduced lung tissue counts of A. fumigatus in a model of invasive aspergillosis in corticosteroid-treated mice while treatment with AmB showed little effect [70]. In a neutropenic murine model of invasive aspergillosis, posaconazole reduced fungal burdens in both groups of animals infected with itraconazole-susceptible or -resistant organisms, and was superior to AmB [71]. No synergy or antagonism was noted when posaconazole was administered concomitantly with AmB to mice infected with C. albicans or Aspergillus flavus [47].

Studies in animal models of endemic mycoses indicate that posaconazole warrants further evaluation in the treatment of these infections in humans. Posaconazole showed efficacy in murine models of disseminated coccidiodomycosis, blastomycosis, and histoplasmosis [72-74].

Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution
No data have been published regarding the disposition in human volunteers or patients. A preliminary pharmacokinetic evaluation of posaconazole was conducted following single-dose i.v. (in hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin vehicle) and p.o. (suspension in methylcellulose) administration to mice, rats, dogs, and cynomolgus monkeys and p.o. administration to rabbits. In dogs, absorption from the gastrointestinal tract was slow and oral bioavailability was 43%-48% [75]. Posaconazole revealed dose-dependent disposition with an elimination half-life of 18 h and 22 h in dogs and monkeys, respectively. Twenty-four hours after a single oral dose, concentrations of posaconazole in plasma were above the MIC and MFC (minimal fungicidal concentration) of most clinically relevant fungal pathogens [76].

Ravuconazole (BMS-207147, formerly ER30346)
Ravuconazole is a derivative of fluconazole with an expanded spectrum of activity in vitro (Fig. 1Go). It is available in oral form.

In Vitro Activity
Ravuconazole possesses broad-spectrum activity against important fungal pathogens, including Candida spp., A. fumigatus, and C. neoformans, as well as most hyaline hyphomycetes (except Fusarium spp.) and some of the dematiaceous fungi (except Pseudallescheria boydii) [40, 77, 78]. Similar to voriconazole and posaconazole, ravuconazole has expanded coverage against C. glabrata and C. krusei in comparison with fluconazole [34].

Experimental Animal Models of Invasive Fungal Diseases
The therapeutic efficacy of oral ravuconazole was compared with that of fluconazole and itraconazole in murine models of systemic and pulmonary infection due to Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and C. neoformans [79]. BMS-207147 was active against pulmonary candidiasis in immunocompromised mice caused by fluconazole-resistant organisms. In this model, compared with fluconazole and itraconazole, only ravuconazole caused a significant reduction in fungal burden in lung tissue. Ravuconazole showed dose-dependent therapeutic efficacy against pulmonary C. neoformans infections in immunocompetent mice. In a murine model of intracranial cryptococcosis in healthy mice, ravuconazole reduced the fungal burden in brain tissue as compared with itraconazole and control treatment. Ravuconazole demonstrated activity comparable to that of AmB in a model of disseminated aspergillosis in neutropenic rabbits [80].

Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution
Plasma pharmacokinetics of ravuconazole have been studied following p.o. and i.v. administration of single doses to mice, rats and dogs [78, 81]. Over a dose range of 2-40 mg/kg in mice, dose proportional increases in Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) were observed. The presence of food enhanced absorption. In dogs, the mean elimination half-life after i.v. injection was 8.8 h.

Liposomal Nystatin
Discovered in the early 1950s, nystatin is the first compound of the large class, polyene antifungal antibiotic (Fig. 2Go). It was never developed for systemic use. However, in the late 1980s, Metha and co-workers demonstrated that encapsulation of nystatin in liposomes had tolerable toxicity and promising antifungal efficacy in vivo [82, 83]. Several recent studies have assessed the efficacy of liposomal nystatin against disseminated candidiasis and invasive A. fumigatus infection in both immunocompetent and neutropenic hosts [84-87]. Whereas free nystatin was lethal and noneffective at its maximal tolerated dose in a mouse model of systemic candidiasis, the liposomal formulation was tolerated and improved survival at equivalent doses, and had markedly increased activity at higher dosages. Liposomal nystatin was well tolerated and was effective in a survival model of disseminated aspergillosis. It was also effective against disseminated and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic rabbits where it prolonged survival and reduced residual tissue fungal burden [87].



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Nystatin.

 
In humans, the compound appears to follow linear plasma pharmacokinetics with peak plasma levels above the MIC of most relevant fungi, and a terminal half-life in the range of 5-7 h at dosages of 1-7 mg/kg/day [87, 88].

Early phase I clinical studies in patients with hematological malignancies and refractory febrile neutropenia revealed no dose-limiting nephrotoxicity at dosages of up to 8 mg/kg/day and a relatively low frequency of infusion-related reactions. Ten of 27 evaluable patients (37%) responded to therapy [89]. Currently ongoing clinical trials target non-neutropenic patients with candidemia, patients with neutropenia and persistent fever, and patients with invasive fungal infection refractory to standard antifungal therapy.

Pradimicin
The pradimicins and the structurally similar benanomicins constitute a unique class of fungicidal antifungal antibiotics originally derived from culture broth filtrates of Actinomycetes. The chemical structure of these compounds is characterized by a benzonaphthacene quinolone skeleton substituted by a D-amino acid and a disaccharide side chain (Fig. 3Go). The pradimicins and benanomicins appeared to possess a novel mechanism of action consisting of specific binding recognition to terminal D-mannosides of the cell wall of fungi, resulting in the formation of a ternary complex consisting of D-mannoside, pradimicin, and calcium that leads to disruption of the integrity of the fungal cell membrane [90, 91]. Both pradimicins and benanomicins have broad-spectrum in vitro antifungal activity against Candida spp., C. neoformans, Aspergillus spp., dematiaceous molds, and zygomycetes [90, 92-94]. In vivo, in healthy rabbits, the lead pradamicin selected for development, BMS-181184, demonstrated nonlinear, dose-dependent kinetics with enhanced clearance, reciprocal shortening of elimination half-life, and an apparently expanding volume of distribution with increasing dosage [95]. BMS-181184 was active against disseminated candidiasis and showed efficacy equivalent to that of amphotericin when used against pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits, without producing any nephrotoxicity [96, 97]. Unfortunately, due to the occurrence of hepatotoxicity in early clinical trials, which had been unpredictable from preclinical toxicity studies, the lead clinical compound was withdrawn from clinical investigation.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Pradimicin and benanomicins.

 

    Antifungal Compounds Targeting Cell-Wall Synthesis
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Recombinant Human Cytokines in...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Ever since the discovery that penicillin inhibits bacterial cell-wall synthesis, pharmaceutical and academic research alike has been searching for equivalent agents to target fungi. The fungal cell wall is a structure that is essential for the fungus and absent from the mammalian host, and, consequently, presents an attractive target for new antifungals.

With considerable variation among different species, the gross macromolecular components of the cell wall of most fungi include chitin, {alpha} or ß linked glucans and a variety of mannoproteins. The dynamics of the fungal cell wall are closely coordinated with cell growth and cell division, and its predominant function is to control the internal turgor pressure of the cell. Disruption of the cell-wall structure leads to osmotic instability, and, ultimately, lysis of the fungal cell [98].

Current investigational systemic antifungal agents directed against or involving the major constituents of the fungal cell wall include the echinocandin lipopeptides and the nucleoside-peptide antibiotic nikkomycin Z [99].

Echinocandin Lipopeptides
Perhaps the most interesting novel class of antifungal agents currently being evaluated in clinical trials is the echinocandins. The echinocandins are natural cyclic lipopeptide antifungal agents that interfere with cell-wall synthesis by noncompetitive inhibition of 1,3 ß-D-glucan synthase, an enzyme that is absent in mammalian cells but present in most pathogenic fungi [100] (Fig. 4Go).





View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Echinocandins. (A) LY 303366; (B) MK 0991; (C) FK 463.

 
The first member of this class, cilofungin, was only active against Candida [98, 101]. Insights into the structure/activity relationship of this drug have led to the generation of semisynthetic echinocandins with considerable increased potency and expanded spectrum and favorable pharmacokinetic properties. The compounds that are currently being developed for clinical use include LY 303366, MK 0991, and FK 463. Because of their distinct mechanism of action, the echinocandins have the potential for use in combination regimens with currently available standard antifungal agents.

LY 303366

In Vitro Activity
LY 303366 is water-soluble and only parenterally administrable. It has potent, rapid in vitro antifungal activity against most Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and against both the trophic and cystic form of Pneumocystis carinii [65, 102-106]. As expected, LY 303366 is active against both fluconazole-sensitive and fluconazole-resistant strains of Candida spp. [102, 104, 107, 108]. A notable omission in the spectrum of activity of these agents is C. neoformans, a fungus that has a different composition of glucan polymer with predominant ß 1,6-linkage. LY 303366 was also not active against B. dermatitidis because of greater cellular reliance upon {alpha}-1,3 D-glucan instead of ß linkage [104].

Experimental Animal Models of Invasive Fungal Diseases
LY 303366 has activity in murine models of superficial and disseminated candidiasis, disseminated aspergillosis and P. carinii pneumonia in both normal and immunocompromised animals [109-114]. The compound was effective against esophageal candidiasis caused by fluconazole-resistant strains of C. albicans in immunocompromised rabbits [115]. LY 303366 prolonged survival in experimental invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits and in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated aspergillosis [116]. This echinocandin reduced the residual fungal load and prolonged survival against both AmB-susceptible and AmB-resistant invasive A. fumigatus infection in a neutropenic mouse model [117].

Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution
In rabbits, LY 303366 demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, potentially peak plasma concentrations in excess of MIC values reported for most susceptible fungal pathogens, and a large volume of distribution suggestive of extensive distribution into tissues [118]. Indeed, tissue levels after multiple dosing are above the MIC in major organs, including the brain. In human volunteers, the compound exhibits linear pharmacokinetics after single oral doses of 100-1,000 mg. Peak plasma levels in that study occurred 6-7 h after ingestion, and the elimination half-life was approximately 30 h. The drug was well tolerated at doses of up to 700 mg with adverse gastrointestinal effects defining the maximal tolerated dose [119]. With the long plasma half-life, once-daily dosing is anticipated.

MK 0991

In Vitro Activity
MK is water-soluble and is available only in parenteral form. It has potent antifungal activity in vitro against most Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., and some dimorphic molds, such as H. capsulatum, C. immitis, and B. dermatitidis [107, 120, 121]. As in the case of LY 303366, MK 0991 showed no evidence of cross-resistance to antifungal triazoles [122]. The compound had no in vitro activity against C. neoformans, T. beigelii, dematiaceous molds, Rhizopus, or Fusarium spp. In vitro synergy of MK 0991 with AmB, 5-FC, and azoles was demonstrated against C. neoformans [123].

Experimental Animal Models of Invasive Fungal Diseases
In both immunocompetent and either neutropenic or corticosteroids immunocompromised murine models of disseminated candidiasis, MK 0991 prolonged survival and led to a significant reduction in the residual burden of fluconazole-sensitive and fluconazole-resistant C. albicans in kidney tissue at dosages as low as 0.0125 and 0.05 mg/kg/day [124-127]. MK 0991 significantly prolonged survival in murine models of disseminated aspergillosis in a manner comparable to AmB deoxycholate, both in immunocompetent and neutropenic animals [125-127]. MK was effective in both the prevention and therapy of experimental murine pulmonary pneumocystosis and in the treatment of murine histoplasmosis [128, 129].

Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution
In mice, rats, monkeys, and chimpanzees, the drug demonstrated dose-proportional pharmacokinetics [130]. Oral bioavailability was <1% in these species. Protein binding was 96% in mouse and human serum. MK 0991 is excreted by the hepatic and renal route with terminal half-life in the range of 5-7.5 h. The single and multiple dose plasma pharmacokinetics of MK 0991 following 1-h intravenous infusions have been investigated in healthy male volunteers [131]. The data are supportive of the evaluation of once-daily dosing regimens in clinical efficacy studies.

Clinical Studies
MK 0991 is currently undergoing clinical investigation. Preliminary results [132] from phase II trials comparing intravenous two-week therapy with MK 0991 50 mg or 70 mg/day and AmB 0.5 mg/kg/day for endoscopically documented Candida esophagitis have been reported. Clinical responses (defined as reduction in symptoms and endoscopic lesions) were documented in 85.1% of MK 0991-treated patients versus 66.7% in the AmB group. Adverse effects during treatment with MK 0991 were uncommon. Additional human clinical trials and pharmocodynamic studies will help to define the role of this novel antifungal agent.

FK 463

In Vitro Activity
FK 463 is a new parenteral echinocandin antifungal drug undergoing clinical development. FK 463 is a lipopeptide compound synthesized by chemical modification of a product from the environmental mold Coleophoma empedri. FK 463 exhibits broad-spectrum activity against clinically important pathogens including Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. FK 463 was also active against azole-resistant Candida spp. FK 463 had no in vitro activity against C. neoformans, T. beigelii, and Fusarium solani [133].

Experimental Animal Models of Invasive Fungal Diseases
In a murine model of disseminated candidiasis, FK 463 significantly prolonged the survival of infected mice and reduced the residual fungal load in kidney. The efficacy against pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic mice was comparable to that of AmB [133, 134]. However, profoundly neutropenic hosts with invasive aspergillosis may have less response to the class of echinocandins as compared to non-neutropenic patients [135].

Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Distribution
Preliminary plasma pharmacokinetic studies in rats and dogs showed dose-proportional increase in AUC and a half-life of approximately 4-6 h. The protein binding was more than 99% [136]. In a phase I study of FK 463 in healthy adult male volunteers, FK 463 was well tolerated up to 50 mg single dosing or 25 mg repeated dosing by all subjects. Cmax and AUC increased in proportion to the dose up to 50 mg. Plasma concentration attained steady state by day 4 with repeated dose [137].

Nikkomycin

Nikkomycin
Chitin is a linear polymer of ß-(1,4)-linked N acetylglucosamine residues. It is synthesized on the cytoplasmic surface of the plasma membrane by chitin synthase [101]. The nikkomycins are potent competitive inhibitors of chitin-synthase. The chemical structure consists of a pyrimidine nucleoside linked to a short peptide moiety (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Nikkomycin Z.

 
The in vitro activity of nikkomycin Z is essentially confined to highly chitinous fungi such as C. immitis and B. dermatitidis. Nikkomycin Z showed promising activity in murine models of pulmonary blastomycosis, coccidiodomycosis, and histoplasmosis [138-140]. The compound was only modestly active against Candida spp. However, recent in vitro studies demonstrate synergistic activity against strains of Candida spp, C. neoformans, and A. fumigatus when nikkomycin Z was combined with fluconazole or itraconazole [141-143]. Based on its unique target, nikkomycin is a potential candidate for clinical development for endemic fungi and in particular in combination with other cell-wall active agents, or the antifungal triazoles.


    Antifungal Compounds Targeting Protein Synthesis
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Recombinant Human Cytokines in...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Sordarins
Protein synthesis has always been considered a highly attractive target in the development of antimicrobial agents. However, application of this idea to the field of antifungal therapy is not an easy task since selectivity is hampered due to the eukaryotic nature of fungi and therefore to the great degree of similarity between the fungal and mammalian protein synthesis [144]. Sordarins, natural fungal products, exert their antifungal effects by specifically inhibiting the protein synthesis elongation cycle in yeasts without affecting protein synthesis machinery in mammalian systems [144] (Fig. 6Go). The proposed mechanism of action of sordarins appears to be inhibition of elongation factor 2 [145]. Some sordarin derivatives, such as GM222712 and GM237354, display excellent in vitro activities against a wide range of pathogenic fungi, including Candida spp., C. neoformans, P. carinii, and certain filamentous fungi and emerging invasive fungal pathogens [146]. Pharmacokinetic studies, in vivo models, and safety data are pending and will delineate whether sordarins can be further developed.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Sordarin.

 

    Recombinant Human Cytokines in the Management of Fungal Infection in Neutropenic Patients
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Recombinant Human Cytokines in...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Reversal or amelioration of immunosuppression is a prerequisite for successful management of invasive fungal infections in any patient. This may include dose reduction or withdrawal of corticosteroids, transfusion of granulocytes, and use of cytokines (such as G-CSF and GM-CSF).

Utilization of recombinant hematopoietic cytokines has led to shortening of the duration of neutropenia and, thereby, to a shortening of the period of greatest risk for developing invasive fungal infections. On the other hand, they also allow for increased dose intensity of antineoplastic chemotherapy. Thus, the full clinical impact of this now ubiquitously employed modality on invasive fungal infections is unclear.

Laboratory studies with GM-CSF suggest that this recombinant cytokine may be active as adjunctive therapy in the management of invasive fungal infections. Interferon {gamma} has been shown to work cooperatively with amphotericin in vivo against cryptococcosis [147]. G-CSF combined with fluconazole extended survival beyond that for fluconazole alone and reduced renal tissue counts below those for fluconazole alone in experimental disseminated candidiasis [148]. It was demonstrated in vitro that voriconazole could collaborate with G-CSF or GM-CSF-activated polymorphonuclear neutrophil or monocytes for significant increased candidacidal activity [149]. This finding suggests that antifungal agents would have additional efficacy in clinical settings in which G-CSF or GM-CSF is used. In a murine pulmonary invasive aspergillosis model, the combination of GM-CSF and voriconazole showed additive efficacy in neutropenic mice [150]. These encouraging results provide a foundation for further laboratory and clinical investigation of recombinant cytokines in the prevention and treatment of fungal infections in neutropenic patients.


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Recombinant Human Cytokines in...
 Conclusions
 References
 
Invasive fungal infections are a frequent and important complication in neutropenic cancer patients and in patients undergoing stem cell or marrow transplantation. The field of antifungal therapy is currently undergoing accelerated changes, and new antifungal agents with novel mechanisms of action will enter clinical practice. In parallel with laboratory evaluation of safety and efficacy, it is hoped that rationally designed clinical trials with these new compounds may ultimately lead to improved prevention and treatment of life-threatening fungal infections.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Antifungal Compounds Targeting...
 Recombinant Human Cytokines in...
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Groll AH, Shah PM, Mentzel C et al. Trends in the postmortem epidemiology of invasive fungal infections at a university hospital. J Infect 1996;33:23-32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Walsh TJ, Hiemenz JW, Anaissie E. Recent progress and current problems in treatment of invasive fungal infections in neutropenic patients. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1996;10:365-400.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Walsh TJ, Hiemenz J, Pizzo PA. Evolving risk factors for invasive fungal infections: all neutropenic patients are not the same. Clin Infec Dis 1994;18:793-798.[Medline]
  4. Walsh TJ, Gonzalez C, Lyman CA et al. Invasive fungal infections in children: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Adv Pediatr Infect Dis 1996;11:187-290.[Medline]
  5. Anaissie E. Opportunistic mycoses in the immunocompromised host: experience at a cancer center and review. Clin Infec Dis 1992;(suppl 1):S43-S53.
  6. Armstrong D. Problems in management of opportunistic fungal infections. Rev Infect Dis 1989;(suppl 7):S1591-S1599.
  7. Pfaller MA, Wenzel R. The impact of changing epidemiology of fungal infections in the 1990s. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1992;11:287-291.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Richardson MD. Opportunistic and pathogenic fungi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991;28(suppl A):1-11.
  9. Walsh TJ. Invasive fungal infections: problems and challenges in developing new antifungal compounds. In: Sutcliffe J, Georgopapadakou NH, eds. Emerging Targets in Antibacterial and Antifungal Chemotherapy. New York: Chapman & Hall, 1992:349-373.
  10. Wong-Beringer A, Jacobs RA, Guglielmo BJ. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: clinical efficacy and toxicities. Clin Infect Dis 1998;27:603-618.[Medline]
  11. Janknergt R, vanEtten EWM, de Marie S. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Curr Opin Infect Dis 1996;9:403-406.[CrossRef]
  12. Hiemenz JW, Walsh TJ. Lipid formulations of amphotericin B: recent progress and future decisions. Clin Infect Dis 1996; 22(suppl 2):S133-S144.
  13. Akova M, Akalin HE, Uzun O et al. Efficacy of fluconazole in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal candidiasis in neutropenic patients with cancer: factors influencing the outcome. Clin Infect Dis 1994;18:298-301.[Medline]
  14. Rex JH, Bennett JE, Sugar AM et al. A randomized trial comparing fluconazole with amphotericin B for the treatment of candidemia in patients without neutropenia. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1325-1330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Edwards JE Jr, Bodey GP, Bowden RA et al. International conference for the development of a consensus on the management and prevention of severe candidal infections. Clin Infect Dis 1997;25:43-59.[Medline]
  16. Phillips P, Shafran S, Garber G et al. Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997;16:337-345.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Anaissie EJ, Darouiche RO, Abi-Said D et al. Management of invasive candidal infections: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study of fluconazole versus amphotericin B and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 1996;23:964-972.[Medline]
  18. Anaissie EJ, Vartivarian SE, Abi-Said D et al. Fluconazole versus amphotericin B in the treatment of hematogenous candidiasis: a matched cohort study. Am J Med 1996;101:170-176.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Anaissie E, Bodey GP, Kantarjian H et al. Fluconazole therapy for chronic disseminated candidiasis in patients with leukemia and prior amphotericin B therapy. Am J Med 1991;91:142-150.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Kauffman CA, Bradley SF, Ross SC et al. Hepatosplenic candidiasis: successful treatment with fluconazole. Am J Med 1991;91:137-141.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Anaissie EJ, Kontoyiannis DP, Huls C et al. Safety, plasma concentrations, and safety of high-dose fluconazole in invasive mold infection. J Infect Dis 1995;172:599-602.[Medline]
  22. Marr KA, White TC, vanBurik JAH et al. Development of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans causing disseminated infection in a patient undergoing marrow transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 1997;25:908-910.[Medline]
  23. Mori T, Matsumura M, Kanamaru Y et al. Myelofibrosis complicated by infection due to Candida albicans: emergence of resistance to agents during therapy. Clin Infect Dis 1997;25:2470-2471.
  24. Nolte FS, Parkinson T, Falconer DJ et al. Isolation and characterization of fluconazole- and amphotericin B-resistant Candida albicans from blood of two patients with leukemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:196-199.[Abstract]
  25. Groll AH, Walsh TJ. Azoles: triazoles. In: Yu VL, Merigan TC Jr, Barriere SL, eds. Antimicrobial Therapy and Vaccines. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1998:1158-1169.
  26. Denning DW, Lee JY, Hostetler JS et al. NIAID Mycoses Study Group multicenter trial of oral itraconazole therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Am J Med 1994;97:135-144.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. White MH, Anaissie EJ, Kusne S et al. Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion vs. amphotericin B as therapy for invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis 1997;24:635-642.[Medline]
  28. Bradford CR, Prentice AG, Warnock DW et al. Comparison of the multiple dose pharmacokinetics of itraconazole during remission induction for acute myeloblastic leukemia. J Antimicrob Chemother 1991;28:555-560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Persat F, Marzullo C, Guyotat D et al. Plasma itraconazole concentrations in neutropenic patients after repeated high-dose treatment. Eur J Cancer 1992;28A:838-841.[CrossRef]
  30. Denning DW, Radford SA, Oakley KL et al. Correlation between in-vitro susceptibility testing to itraconazole and in-vivo outcome of Aspergillus fumigatus infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;40:401-414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Groll AH, Piscitelli SC, Walsh TJ. Clinical pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents: a comprehensive review of agents in clinical use, current investigational compounds, and putative targets for antifungal drug development. Adv Pharmacol 1998;44:343-500.
  32. Barry AL, Brown SD. In vitro studies of two triazole antifungal agents (voriconazole [UK-109,496] and fluconazole) against Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:1948-1949.[Abstract]
  33. Macro F, Pfaller MA, Messer S et al. In vitro activities of voriconazole (UK-109,496) and four other antifungal agents against 394 clinical isolates of Candida spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42:161-163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ et al. In vitro susceptibilities of Candida bloodstream isolates to the new triazole antifungal agents BMS-207147, Sch 56592, and voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42:3242-3244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. In vitro efficacy and fungicidal activity of voriconazole against Aspergillus and Fusarium species. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1998;17:573-575.[Medline]
  36. Murphy ME, Bernard M, Ishimaru T et al. Activity of voriconazole (UK-109,496) against clinical isolates of Aspergillus species and its effectiveness in an experimental model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:696-698.[Abstract]
  37. Nguyen MH, Yu CY. Voriconazole against fluconazole-susceptible and resistant Candida isolates: in-vitro efficacy compared with that of itraconazole and ketoconazole. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;42:253-256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. McGinnis MR, Pasarell L, Sutton DA et al. In vitro activity of voriconazole against selected fungi. Med Mycol 1998;36:239-242.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Radford SA, Johnson EM, Warnock DW. In vitro studies of activity of voriconazole (UK-109,496), a new triazole antifungal agent, against emerging and less-common mold pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:841-843.[Abstract]
  40. Ruhnke M, Schmidt-Westhausen A, Trautmann M. In vitro activities of voriconazole (UK-109,486) against fluconazole-susceptible and -resistant Candida albicans isolates from oral cavities of patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:575-577.[Abstract]
  41. Nguyen MH, Yu CY. In vitro comparative efficacy of voriconazole and itraconazole against fluconazole-susceptible and resistant Cryptococcus neoformans isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42:471-472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Macro F, Pfaller MA, Messer SA et al. Antifungal activity of a new triazole, voriconazole (UK-109-496), compared with three other antifungal agents tested against clinical isolates of filamentous fungi. Med Mycol 1998;36:433-436.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Wildfeuer A, Seidl HP, Paule I et al. In vitro evaluation of voriconazole against clinical isolates of yeasts, moulds and dermatophytes in comparison with itraconazole, ketoconazole, amphotericin B and griseofulvin. Mycoses 1998;41:309-319.[Medline]
  44. Troke PF, Brammer KW, Hitchcock CA et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: activity in systemic candidiasis models and early clinical efficacy in oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC). In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:125.
  45. Hitchcock CA, Andrews BJ, Lewis BGH et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: antifungal activity in experimental infections with Aspergillus. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:125.
  46. George D, Miniter P, Andriole VT. Efficacy of UK-109496, a new triazole antifungal agent, in an experimental model of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:86-91.[Abstract]
  47. Sheehan DJ, Hitchcock CA, Sibley C. Current and emerging azole antifungal agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:40-79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Martin MV, Yates J, Hitchcock CA. Comparison of voriconazole ( UK-109,496) and itraconazole in prevention and treatment of Aspergillus fumigatus endocarditis in guinea pigs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:13-16.[Abstract]
  49. Hitchcock CA, Andrews BJ, Lewis BGH et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: antifungal activity in experimental infections with cryptococcus. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:126.
  50. Groll AH, Walsh TJ. Potential new antifungal agents. Curr Opin Infect Dis 1997;10:449-458.[CrossRef]
  51. Patterson BE, Coates PE. UK-109,946, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: pharmacokinetics in man. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:125.
  52. Jezequel SG, Clark M, Evans K et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: disposition in animals. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:126.
  53. Patterson BE, Coates PE, Jezequel SG. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: disposition in man. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:126.
  54. Denning D, de Favero A, Gluckman E et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: clinical efficacy in invasive aspergillosis. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:126.
  55. Koltin Y, Hitchcock CA. Progress in the search for new triazole antifungal agents. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1997;1:176-182.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Dupont B, Denning D, Lode H et al. UK-109,496, a novel, wide-spectrum triazole derivative for the treatment of fungal infections: clinical efficacy in chronic invasive aspergillosis. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:126.
  57. Hegener P, Troke PF, Fakenheuer G et al. Treatment of fluconazole-resistant candidiasis with voriconazole in patients with AIDS. AIDS 1998;12:2227-2228.[Medline]
  58. Girmenia C, Luzi G, Monaco M et al. Use of voriconazole in treatment of Scedosporium apisospermum infection: case report. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:1436-1438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Schwartz S, Milatovic D, Thiel E. Successful treatment of cerebral aspergillosis with a novel triazole (voriconazole) in a patient with acute leukemia. Br J Haematol 1997;97:663-665.[Medline]
  60. Law D, Moore CB, Denning DW. Activity of Sch 56592 compared with those of fluconazole and itraconazole against Candida spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:2310-2311.[Abstract]
  61. Pfaller MA, Messer S, Jonew RN. Activity of a new triazole, posaconazole, compared of four other antifungal agents tested against clinical isolates of Candida spp. and Saccaromyces cervisiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;34:1648-1654.
  62. Galgiani JN, Lewis ML. In vitro studies of activities of the antifungal triazoles Sch 56592 and itraconazole against Candida albicans, Cryptococcus neoformans, and other pathogenic yeasts. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:180-183.[Abstract]
  63. Perfect JR, Cox GM, Dodge RK et al. In vitro and in vivo efficacies of the azole Sch 56592 against Cryptococcus neoformans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:1910-1913.[Abstract]
  64. Oakley KL, Moore CB, Denning DW. In vitro activity of Sch 56592 and comparison with activities of amphotericin B and itraconazole against Aspergillus spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:1504-1507.[Abstract]
  65. Espinel-Ingroff A. Comparison of in vitro activities of the new triazole posaconazole and the echinocandins MK 0991 (L-743,872) and LY303366 against opportunistic filamentous and dimorphic fungi and yeasts. J Clin Microbiol 1998;36:2950-2956.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Cacciapuoti A, Parmegiani R, Lobenberg D et al. Efficacy of Sch56592 in pulmonary aspergillosis and candidiasis in mice. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:124.
  67. Cacciapuoti A, Lobenberg D, Frank D et al. Effect of delayed or extensive treatment with Sch56592 or concomitant treatment with amphotericin B in murine models of pulmonary aspergillosis and systemic candidiasis. In: Program and Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1996:116.
  68. Cole GT, Seshan KR, Lobenberg D et al. Evaluation of Sch56592 in clearance of mucosal candidiasis from mice with retroviral-induced immunodeficiency. In: Program and Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1996:116.
  69. Parmegiani R, Cacciapuoti A, Lobenberg D et al. Efficacy of Sch56592 in topical infection models. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:124.
  70. Graybill JR, Bocanegra R, Najvar LK et al. Sch56592 treatment of murine invasive aspergillosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 1998;42:539-542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Oakley KL, Morrissey G, Denning DW. Efficacy of Sch56592 in a temporarily neutropenic murine model of invasive aspergillosis with an itraconazole-susceptible and an itraconazole-resistant isolate of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:1504-1507.
  72. Connolly P, Wheat J, Schizlein-Bick C et al. Comparison of a new triazole antifungal agent, Schering 56592, with itraconazole and amphotericin B for treatment of histoplasmosis in immunocompetent mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999;43:322-328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Sugar AM, Liu XP. In vitro and in vivo activities of Sch56592 against Blastomyces dermatitidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:1314-1316.[Abstract]
  74. Lutz JE, Clemons KV, Aristizabal BH et al. Activity of the triazole Sch56592 against disseminated murine coccidiodomycosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:1558-1561.[Abstract]
  75. Nomeir A, Kumari P, Hilbert MJ et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics of a new triazole antifungal agent of Sch56592 in mice, rat, rabbits, dogs and cynomolgus monkeys. In: Program and Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1996:124.
  76. Nomeir A, Kumari P, Hilbert MJ et al. Bioavailability of Sch56592, a broad spectrum triazole antifungal agent from various formulations. In: Program and Abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1996:117.
  77. Fung-Tomc JC, Huczko E, Minassian B et al. In vitro activity of a new oral triazole, BMS-207147 (ER-30346). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42:313-318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  78. Hata K, Kimura J, Miki H. In vitro and vivo antifungal activities of ER-30346, a novel oral triazole with a broad spectrum antifungal spectrum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:2237-2242.[Abstract]
  79. Hata K, Kimura J, Miki H et al. Efficacy of ER-30346, a novel oral triazole antifungal agent, in experimental models of aspergillosis, candidiasis, and cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:2243-2247.[Abstract]
  80. Shock K, Marino S, Baumgartner T et al. Efficacy of a new triazole, BMS-207147, in a model of invasive aspergillosis in immunosuppressed, neutropenic rabbits. In: Final Program Presentation Summaries Abstracts of the 9th Focus on Fungal Infections. San Diego, CA, 1999.
  81. Nakamura T, Sakai J, Sonoda T et al. ER 30346, a novel antifungal triazole. IV. Pharmacokinetic and toxicological studies in mice, rats, and dogs. Abstract F94. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:129.
  82. Metha RT, Hopfer, RL, Gunner LA et al. Formulation, toxicity, and antifungal activity in vitro of liposome-encapsulated nystatin as therapeutic agent for systemic candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987;31:1897-1900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  83. Metha RT, Hopfer RL, McQueen T et al. Toxicity and therapeutic effects in mice of liposome-encapsulated nystatin for systemic fungal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987;31:1901-1903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  84. Wallace TL, Paetznick V, Cossum PA et al. Activity of liposomal nystatin against disseminated Aspergillus fumigatus infection in neutropenic mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:2238-2243.[Abstract]
  85. Rolston K, Baird I, Graham DR et al. Treatment of refractory candidemia in non-neutropenic patients with liposomal nystatin (NyotranTM). In: Abstracts of the 38th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1998:LB-1.
  86. Gordon D, Baird I, Darouiche R et al. Liposomal nystatin vs amphotericin B for candidemia in non-neutropenic patients: a historic comparison. In: Program and Abstracts of the 35th Meeting of the Infectious Disease Society of America. Arlington, VA: Infectious Disease Society of America, 1997;98a.
  87. Groll AH, Gonzalez CE, Giri N et al. Liposomal nystatin against experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits: efficacy, safety and non-compartmental pharmacokinetics. J Antimicrob Chemother 1999;43:95-103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  88. Groll AH. Phase-I study of maximum tolerated dose of intravenous liposomal nystatin for the treatment of refractory febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological malignancies. In: Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:LB-1.
  89. Boutati EI, Maltezou HC, Lopez-Berestein G et al. Phase I study of maximum tolerated dose of intravenous liposomal nystatin for the treatment of refractory febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological malignancies. In: Abstracts of the 35th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1995:LB-1.
  90. Walsh TJ, Giri N. Pradimicins: a novel class of broad -spectrum antifungal compounds. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1997;16:93-97.[CrossRef][Medline]
  91. Sawada Y, Numata K, Murakami T et al. Calcium-dependent anticandidal action of pradimicin A. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1990;43:715-721.[Medline]
  92. Fung-Tomc JC, Minassian B, Huczko E et al. In vitro antifungal and fungicidal spectra of a new pradimicin derivative, BMS-181184. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995;39:295-300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  93. Watanabe M, Hiratani T, Uchida K et al. The in-vitro activity of an antifungal antibiotic benamomicin A in comparison with amphotericin B. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996;38:1073-1077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  94. Wardle HM, Law D, Denning DW. In vitro activity of BMS-181184 compared with those of fluconazole and amphotericin B against various Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996;40:2229-2231.[Abstract]
  95. Groll AH, Sein T, Peitraitis V et al. Compartmental pharmacokinetics and tissue drug distribution of the pradimicin derivative BMS 181184 in rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42:2700-2705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  96. Restrepo MI, Najvar LK, Fothergill AW et al. Pradimicin therapy of disseminated Candida tropicalis infection in the mouse. Med Mycol 1998;36:181-184.[CrossRef][Medline]
  97. Gonzalez CE, Groll AH, Giri N et al. Antifungal activity of the pradimicin derivative BMS 181184 in the treatment of experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42:2399-2404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  98. Debono M, Gordee RS. Antibiotics that inhibit fungal cell wall development. Annu Rev Microbiol 1994;48:471-497.[CrossRef][Medline]
  99. Current WL, Tang J, Boylan C et al. Glucan biosynthesis as a target for antifungal therapy: the echinocandin class of antifungal agents. In: Dixon GK, Copping LG, Hollomon DW, eds. Antifungal Agents: Discovery and Mode. Oxford, UK: BIOS Scientific Publishers Ltd., 1995:143-60.
  100. Denning DW. Echinocandins and pneumocandins—a new antifungal class with a novel mode of action. J Antimicrob Chemother 1997;40:611-614.[Free Full Text]
  101. Hector FR. Compounds active against cell walls of medically important fungi. Clin Microbiol Rev 1993;6:1-21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  102. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Coffman S. In vitro susceptibilities of clinical yeasts isolates to a new echinocandin derivative, LY 303366, and other antifungal agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:763-766.[Abstract]
  103. Pfaller MA, Macro F, Messer SA et al. In vitro activity of two echinocandin derivatives, LY 303366 and MK 0991 (L-743,792), against clinical isolates of Aspergillus, Fusarium, Rhizopus, and other filamentous fungi. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1998;30:251-255.[CrossRef][Medline]
  104. Zhanel GG, Karlowsky JA, Harding GA et al. In vitro activity of a new semisynthetic echinocandin, LY-303366, against systemic isolates of Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, Blastomyces dermatitidis, and Aspergillus species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997;41:863-865.[Abstract]