help button home button The Oncologist http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/misc/eLetters.shtml
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Oncologist, Vol. 13, No. 5, 548-561, May 2008; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0243
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soon, P. S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soon, P. S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Sidhu, S. B.

Endocrinology

Molecular Markers and the Pathogenesis of Adrenocortical Cancer

Patsy S. H. Soona,b, Kerrie L. McDonalda, Bruce G. Robinsona,c, Stan B. Sidhua,d

aCancer Genetics, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, bDepartment of Surgery, Bankstown Hospital and University of New South Wales, cDepartment of Endocrinology, and dDepartment of Endocrine and Oncology Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, Australia and University of Sydney

Key Words. Adrenocortical carcinoma • Adrenocortical adenoma • Adrenocortical tumors • Molecular marker

Correspondence: Stan Sidhu, MBBS, PhD, FRACS, Department of Endocrine and Oncology Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia. Telephone: 61-2-94371731; Fax: 61-2-99268523; e-mail: stansidhu{at}nebsc.com.au

Received December 12, 2007; accepted for publication March 24, 2008.

Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were reported by the authors.


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Adrenal tumors are common, with an estimated incidence of 7.3% in autopsy cases, while adrenocortical carcinomas (ACCs) are rare, with an estimated prevalence of 4–12 per million population. Because the prognoses for adrenocortical adenomas (ACAs) and ACCs are vastly different, it is important to be able to accurately differentiate the two tumor types. Advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiology of ACCs is essential for the development of more sensitive means of diagnosis and treatment, resulting in better clinical outcome. Adrenocortical tumors (ACTs) occur as a component of several hereditary tumor syndromes, which include the Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, multiple endocrine neoplasia 1, Carney complex, and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The genes involved in these syndromes have also been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of sporadic ACTs. The adrenocorticotropic hormone–cAMP–protein kinase A and Wnt pathways are also implicated in adrenocortical tumorigenesis. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the molecular mechanisms involved in adrenocortical tumorigenesis, including results of comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and microarray gene-expression profiling studies.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Adrenal tumors are common, with an estimated incidence of 7.3% in autopsy cases [1]. A recent computed tomography (CT) study reported an overall 4.4% prevalence rate of adrenal lesions [2]. Adrenocortical carcinomas (ACCs), however, are rare, with an estimated prevalence of 4–12 per million population [3]. Because the prognoses for adrenocortical adenomas (ACAs) and ACCs are vastly different, it is important to be able to accurately differentiate the two tumor types. At present, the modified Weiss score is the most widely accepted pathological system for classifying adrenocortical tumors (ACTs) as benign or malignant [4]. This histopathological scoring system involves nine criteria—high mitotic rate, atypical mitoses, high nuclear grade, low percentage of clear cells, necrosis, diffuse architecture of the tumor, capsular invasion, sinusoidal invasion, and venous invasion. The presence of each criterion is given a score of 1, and a total score ≤2 is typically associated with an ACA while a score ≥3 is indicative of an ACC [46]. In a study of 24 malignant and 25 benign ACTs, a Weiss score ≥3 had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96% in predicting malignancy. The authors noted, however, that the interobserver agreement for certain criteria, such as architecture, sinusoid invasion, nuclear grade, and venous invasion, was not reliable [4]. Furthermore, even when applied correctly, the Weiss system is far from infallible, and individual ACTs may go on to behave in a malignant manner despite initially receiving a Weiss score ≤2 [79]. Another shortcoming of this classification system is its restriction to providing descriptive information only on the tumor's morphology; consequently, it does not offer any molecular targets for therapy development.

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for ACCs. Open adrenalectomy is recommended for excision of malignant primary adrenal lesions [1012] because there have been some case reports that laparoscopic adrenalectomy for ACCs actually increases the risk for peritoneal dissemination and metastasis [1315]. Despite radical surgery with curative intent, for patients with localized ACCs, the majority will develop metastases within 6–24 months of resection [16].

About one fifth of the patients with ACC present with advanced disease that is not cured by surgery [17, 18]. The treatment of choice for these patients is mitotane (o,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane). Up to one third of patients have at least a partial response to mitotane [19]. The largest series of mitotane use after surgery compared with surgery alone, in 177 patients with ACCs from eight centers in Italy and 47 centers in Germany, was published recently. All patients had radical resection with a follow-up of up to 10 years. Forty-seven of the 177 patients had mitotane after surgery, while the remainder of the patients had surgery alone. Mitotane treatment was associated with significantly longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival times compared with the control [16].

Radiotherapy to the tumor bed has also been used as adjuvant treatment after radical resection of ACC. Reports with small numbers of patients have described response rates of up to 42%. Fassnacht et al. [20] compared a group of 14 patients who received radiotherapy to the tumor bed with a matched control group of 14 patients. The local recurrence rate was significantly lower in the radiotherapy group, at 14%, compared with 79% in the control group. The disease-free and overall survival times, however, were not significantly different between the two groups [20].

ACCs have a 10%–40% response rate to various chemotherapeutic agents. Chemotherapeutic drugs that have been reported to have some effect against ACCs include etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. ACCs tend to express the multidrug resistance gene MDR-1, which results in the production of P-glycoprotein, which is involved in the removal of the drug from cancer cells. Because of this multidrug resistance gene, single-agent chemotherapy is not favored for ACCs [21].

Advancement in the understanding of the pathophysiology of ACCs is essential for the development of more sensitive means of diagnosis and treatment, resulting in better clinical outcome. The aim of this review is to summarize the current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in adrenocortical tumorigenesis.


    MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF ACCS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Hereditary Tumor Syndromes
ACTs can arise from several hereditary tumor syndromes. The causative genes in these syndromes have also been found to be involved in the tumorigenesis of some sporadic ACTs. Table 1 summarizes these hereditary tumor syndromes and the genes/chromosomal loci involved.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Summary of hereditary tumor syndromes associated with ACTs

 

Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS; OMIM 151623) is an autosomal dominant familial disease characterized by the early onset of tumors and multiple tumors in affected individuals. Families with this syndrome also have multiple affected family members. The most common tumor types that occur in LFS are soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, breast cancer, brain tumors, leukemia, and ACCs [22, 23]. ACCs have been reported to occur in 3%–4% of patients with LFS, often under the age of 20 [23]. Seventy percent of LFS cases are a result of a germline mutation in the TP53 gene [24]. A second variant is caused by a heterozygous germline mutation in the hCHK2 gene [25], while a four centi-Morgan region on 1q23 has been implicated in a third variant [26].

Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS; OMIM 130650) is a congenital overgrowth syndrome characterized by exomphalos, macroglossia, and gigantism in the neonate as well as the development of childhood tumors. These tumors, which include ACC, nephroblastoma, hepatoblastoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma, occur in 5% of patients [27]. About 15% of cases with BWS are familial, with the remainder being sporadic. BWS is linked to the 11p15 chromosomal locus. This region is subject to parental imprinting, a genetic phenomenon in which specific genes are expressed solely either from the maternal or paternal allele. Genes located at 11p15 and implicated in the pathogenesis of BWS are the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2), H19, and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (CDKN1C also known as p57kip2) genes. IGF2 is maternally imprinted, while H19 and p57kip2 are both paternally imprinted. Paternal uniparental isodisomy (duplication of the paternal allele and loss of the maternal allele) of 11p15 [28], germline mutations of p57kip2, or methylation of H19 and potassium channel, voltage-gated, KQT-like subfamily, member 1 (KCNQ1) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of BWS [27]. p57kip2 encodes a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor that belongs to the CIP/KIP family of cell-cycle regulators. Overexpression of this gene arrests cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. H19 is transcribed to RNA but not translated to protein. It is thought to be involved in the regulation of IGF2 [27].

Carney Complex
Carney complex (CNC; OMIM 160980) is a dominantly inherited syndrome characterized by cardiac, endocrine, cutaneous, and neural myxomatous tumors, as well as pigmented lesions of the skin and mucosa [2931]. Primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD), a main feature of CNC, is a rare cause of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-independent Cushing's syndrome, usually in children and young adults [32]. There are two types of CNC—type 1 is caused by mutation of the protein kinase, cAMP-dependent, regulatory, type 1, alpha (PRKAR1A) gene, located on 17q23-q24 [33], while type 2 has been attributed to the 2p16 chromosomal locus [34].

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia 1
Multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN1; OMIM 131100) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by the occurrence of parathyroid, pancreatic islet cell, and anterior pituitary tumors [35]. In 55% of individuals diagnosed with MEN1, ACTs (typically ACAs) have also been reported [3639]. ACCs have only rarely been reported with MEN1 [3739]. The MEN1 gene, located on 11q13, encodes the menin protein. Although the function of menin is currently unknown, mutations have resulted in the loss of its function, suggesting that menin has tumor suppressor activities [40, 41]. Because menin is located in the nucleus, it is thought to play a role in the cell cycle, regulation of transcription, or DNA replication [35].

Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is an autosomal recessive disorder resulting from an enzyme deficiency in the cortisol synthesis pathway. Typically, the enzyme 21-hydroxylase, which is encoded by cytochrome P450, family 21, subfamily B (CYP21B; OMIM 201910), is deficient. A lack of this enzyme leads to compensatory stimulation of the adrenal cortex by corticotrophin-releasing hormone and ACTH with consequent adrenal hyperplasia and overproduction of cortisol precursors, engendering higher levels of androgens. Deficiencies of 11β-hydoxylase, 17{alpha}-hydroxylase, and 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase are less commonly the cause of CAH. Clinically, CAH is divided into a classic (severe) salt wasting or simple virilizing form and a nonclassic (mild) form [4244]. Assessment for adrenal lesions with abdominal CT in CAH patients and heterozygous carriers of CAH found that all CAH patients had adrenal hyperplasia as well as twice the rate of adrenal tumors, at 82%, compared with CAH carriers, at 45%. One in 11 patients with CAH and one in 20 carriers of CAH had adrenal tumors >5 cm [45]. Rarely, ACCs have been described in CAH [46, 47].


    GENETICS OF SPORADIC ACTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
TP53 Gene
The TP53 gene is a tumor suppressor gene and is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancers [48]. The p53 protein plays a role as a transcription factor in regulation of the cell cycle, causing cell cycle arrest or cell death in response to DNA damaging agents such as radiation and viruses [49]. Germline mutations of TP53 have usually been observed to occur in the highly conserved region of exons 5–8 [50].

TP53 mutation is thought to be a late event in the evolution of malignant transformation in sporadic ACTs. Mutations in exons 5–8 of TP53 have been found in 20%–27% of sporadic ACCs and 0%–6% of sporadic ACAs [51, 52]. Sequencing of exons 2–11 of TP53 in one study found mutations in 25% of sporadic ACCs, all of which occurred in exons 5–8. Patients with TP53 mutation showed a trend towards a shorter survival duration (p = .098) [53]. Frequent somatic mutations in exon 4 of TP53, however, have been reported in 60% of ACAs and 50% of pheochromocytomas in Taiwanese patients [54], but these findings were not confirmed in a study on white patients [55], suggesting that perhaps different ethnic backgrounds may result in different TP53 mutations.

The majority of TP53 mutations occur in its DNA-binding domain. Less commonly, mutations in the oligomerization domain can occur [56]. Numerous missense mutations have been described for TP53 [57]. In ACCs, the R337H mutation in the oligomerization domain of the p53 protein results in the substitution of histidine for arginine at codon 337. This mutation is commonly found as a germline mutation in children with ACCs in southern Brazil [58]. It has been estimated that one in 10 carriers of this mutation develops ACC. In these cases of ACC, there is loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the normal wild-type TP53 allele with retention of the R337H mutated allele [59]. Other missense mutations as well as nonsense mutations and deletions of TP53 have also been described [5153, 60, 61].

The IGF2, p57kip2 (CDKN1C), and H19 Genes
Rearrangements, LOH (loss of one of two alleles of a gene), and abnormal imprinting of the 11p15.5 locus, resulting in low p57kip2 and H19 and elevated IGF2 mRNA expression levels, have been reported in sporadic ACCs [6264].

The IGF system is comprised of two peptide ligands (IGF1 and IGF2), two IGF receptors (IGF1R and IGF2R/ mannose-6-phosphate receptor), and six high-affinity binding proteins (IGF binding proteins 1–6) [65]. In the adrenal gland, both IGF1 and IGF2 have growth-promoting as well as differentiating functions. They induce steroidogenesis in adrenocortical cells both in vitro and in vivo. IGF2 at high levels (50 times that of insulin) can also exert an insulin effect, leading to hypoglycemia.

In sporadic ACCs, IGF1 has not been shown to be overexpressed [66]. IGF2, however, has frequently been reported to be overexpressed in ACCs compared with ACAs or normal adrenal cortices [6769]. Higher IGF2 expression levels are associated with a more malignant phenotype [66], and overexpression of IGF2 is associated with a higher risk for ACC recurrence [63]. Furthermore, LOH of the 11p15 locus has been demonstrated more frequently in ACCs than in ACAs—in 67% of ACCs versus 13% of ACAs. It is suggested that this LOH event leads to overexpression of IGF2 because the maternal allele is lost while the paternal allele is duplicated, leading to a double dose of the expressed allele [62].

Studies with IGF2–transgenic mice have shown that the weights of the adrenal glands of these animals are significantly higher than those of controls, a result of hyperplasia of the zona fasciculata. Despite adrenal hyperplasia, over an 18-month period, these transgenic mice did not develop tumors in their adrenal glands, indicating that overexpression of IGF2 alone is insufficient to cause ACT formation and that other factors are required for tumorigenesis [70].

The p57kip2 gene is located within the 11p15 region and is paternally imprinted. It encodes a CDK inhibitor, which binds to cyclin–CDK complexes and inactivates their catalytic domain. It therefore functions as a negative regulator of cell cycle progression. By northern blot, p57kip2 mRNA was easily detected in normal adrenals and in all tumors with normal expression of IGF2, but was absent or low in tumors with overexpression of IGF2 and in the NCI-H295R adrenocortical cell line [71].

Somatic mutations of the p57kip2 gene are rare and do not account for the lower levels of p57kip2 mRNA and protein expression in ACCs. Instead, other mechanisms, such as LOH and abnormalities of imprinting or methylation, could be responsible for the lower mRNA and protein levels with this gene [61].

MEN1 Gene
Because LOH of 11q13 occurs in about 20% of sporadic ACTs, and adrenal tumors occur in up to 40% of patients from MEN1 kindreds, MEN1 was considered to be a prime candidate gene in the pathogenesis of these lesions. LOH of 11q13 is frequently found in ACCs but not in ACAs. Because the MEN1 mRNA expression by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and northern blot has been found to be similar in ACCs, ACAs, and normal adrenal cortices, and because no mutations within the MEN1 coding region were found in 33 sporadic ACTs and cell lines, it is unlikely that the MEN1 gene plays a prominent part in the pathogenesis of sporadic ACTs [7274].

PRKAR1A Gene
PRKAR1A is the main mediator of cAMP signaling [75]. One study found LOH of 17q22–24, the locus for PRKAR1A, in 23% of ACAs and 53% of ACCs. Direct sequencing of the PRKAR1A gene revealed inactivating mutations in 10% of ACAs, with corresponding lower mRNA and protein levels in these tumors. These tumors were also smaller in size and exhibited paradoxical cortisol responses to dexamethasone, all features that are found in PPNAD. No mutations were found in ACCs. This is consistent with PPNAD, in which there has not been a case of ACC reported to date [76].


    THE GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE-BINDING PROTEIN, ALPHA-STIMULATING ACTIVITY POLYPEPTIDE GENE
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Activating somatic mutations of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein, alpha-stimulating activity polypeptide (GNAS) gene, located on 20q13.2, are responsible for the McCune Albright syndrome (MAS; OMIM 174800), a pediatric genetic disease. GNAS encodes the alpha subunit of the stimulatory G protein (Gs{alpha}). In abnormal Gs{alpha}, there is a substitution of arginine 201 with histidine or cysteine, with subsequent lower GTPase activity, resulting in constitutive adenylate cylase activation and consequent cAMP signaling [7779]. MAS is a sporadic disease that predominantly affects the skeleton, skin, and endocrine system. Classic manifestations include a triad of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, large irregular café-au-lait spots, and endocrine dysfunction, including precocious puberty, hyperthyroidism, gigantism, and Cushing's syndrome. Because the genes involved in MAS and CNC both act on the cAMP pathway, the endocrine features of the two syndromes are very similar.

GNAS has been reported to rarely be mutated in sporadic ACAs. Mutation of codon 201 of GNAS has been reported in ACAs and tumors of patients with ACTH-independent macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia (AIMAH) [80, 81]. There have been no reports, however, of GNAS mutations in sporadic ACCs.


    SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN ACTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Many different pathways are involved in cancer development. In ACTs, the ACTH–cAMP–protein kinase A (PKA) and Wnt pathways are thought to be important.

The ACTH–cAMP–PKA Pathway
The binding of ACTH to its receptor, a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, results in the dissociation of the heterotrimeric Gs, causing the separation of the {alpha} subunit from the β and {gamma} subunits and stimulation of adenylate cyclase, which in turn leads to the production of cAMP from ATP. cAMP then binds to the regulatory subunits of PKA, releasing the catalytic subunits, which results in phosphorylation of proteins in the cytoplasm and nucleus, and subsequent signal transduction [82] (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of the ACTH–cAMP–PKA pathway.

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; C, catalytic subunit of PKA; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CREB, cAMP response element; Gs{alpha}, G-protein {alpha} subunit; Gβ, G-protein β subunit; G{gamma}, G-protein {gamma} subunit; GDP, guanosine diphosphate; GTP, guanosine triphosphate; P, phosphate; PKA, protein kinase A; R, regulatory subunit of PKA.

Adapted from http://www.biocarta.com/pathfiles/h_gsPathway.asp, with permission.

 
The ACTH–adenylate cyclase signaling pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of ACTs for a number of reasons. First, activating mutations of components of the adenylate cyclase pathway have been found in other human endocrine disorders, including toxic thyroid adenomas and acromegaly [83]. Second, there is a correlation between circulating ACTH levels and the size of the adrenal cortex, as seen in patients with CAH or Cushing's disease [84]. Finally, patients with CNC and MAS exhibit mutations in the PRKAR1A and GNAS genes, respectively. Both of these gene products are components of the cAMP pathway [33, 85]. No activating mutations of the melanocortin 2 receptor (MC2R; ACTH receptor) gene were found in 25 ACAs, 13 ACCs, and eight hyperplasias [81, 86, 87]. LOH of MC2R, however, was found in one of 16 ACAs and two of four ACCs [88], suggesting that loss of the ACTH receptor and response may play a role in adrenocortical tumorigenesis. Overall, ACTH is thought to have differentiating and growth inhibitory functions on adrenocortical cells [82, 89].

The Wnt Pathway
The Wnt family is comprised of a group of highly conserved growth factors with similar amino acid sequences, which play roles in developmental and homeostatic processes. The central event in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway is the accumulation of β-catenin in the cytoplasm with subsequent translocation into the nucleus. Wnt binds to its receptor complex, which is composed of members of the frizzled family and low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. This results in the inhibition of the axin–adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)–glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3) complex, leading to a block in β-catenin phosphorylation by GSK-3 and accumulation of β-catenin in the cytoplasm. β-catenin then translocates into the nucleus where it interacts with the T cell–specific transcription factor/lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 family of transcription factors to regulate transcription of Wnt target genes (Fig. 2A). In the absence of Wnt stimulation of its receptor, GSK-3 phosphorylates β-catenin, resulting in its ubiquitylation and degradation by proteosomes [90] (Fig. 2B).


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Diagrammatic representation of the Wnt pathway. (A): Wnt pathway in the presence of Wnt ligand. (B): Wnt pathway in the absence of Wnt ligand.

Abbreviations: APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; GSK-3, glycogen synthase kinase 3β; LRP, lipoprotein receptor–related protein; P, phosphate; TCF/LEF, T cell–specific transcription factor/lymphoid enhancer-binding factor.

Adapted from the Wnt homepage, http://www.stanford.edu/~rnusse/wntwindow.html#diagrams, with permission.

 
The Wnt pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several cancers [9193], in particular, in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and in the development of colorectal carcinomas [94]. The Wnt pathway was analyzed in 26 ACAs and 13 ACCs. Abnormal cytoplasmic and/or nuclear accumulation of β-catenin was found in 10 of 26 (38%) ACAs and 11 of 13 (77%) ACCs, with a focal pattern in ACAs and a diffuse pattern in ACCs. Abnormal immunohistochemisty (IHC) for β-catenin was also more common in nonfunctioning (83%) than in functioning (25%) ACAs. The β-catenin gene was screened for mutations, with similar frequencies of mutations found in both ACAs and ACCs—seven of 26 (27%) ACAs and four of 13 (31%) ACCs—and only in tumors displaying abnormal β-catenin immunostaining. Because there is a higher rate of abnormal IHC for β-catenin in ACCs than in ACAs but similar rates of mutation of the β-catenin gene in the two groups, other components of the Wnt signaling pathway, such as APC or axin, may contribute to the pathogenesis of ACCs. Because β-catenin mutation was found in both ACAs and ACCs, it may be an early step in a common multistep pathogenesis of both ACAs and ACCs [95].


    CLONAL ANALYSIS OF ACTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Knudson [96] hypothesized that the pathogenesis of cancer involves a multistep process with an initiating event followed by events that result in tumor progression. The initiating event is thought to be a mutation in a single cell that confers upon it a growth advantage, resulting in monoclonal proliferation of that cell and cancer formation [96].

Clonal analysis of tumors determines the X inactivation patterns in females heterozygous for X-linked polymorphisms. It is based on the rationale that only a single X chromosome is active in each somatic cell of a female. As a result, either the maternal or paternal X chromosome is randomly inactivated and this is transmitted in a highly stable fashion to the progeny cell [97]. Because X chromosome inactivation is random, it is expected that there are equal proportions of cells with the maternal and paternal X chromosomes. The presence of only either the maternal or the paternal X chromosome in all the cells indicates that the tumor is monoclonal.

Three clonal composition studies have shown that 60%–100% of ACCs are monoclonal while 77.4%–100% of adrenal hyperplasias and 12.5%–43% of ACAs are polyclonal [98100]. Interestingly, one study examined both adrenal glands of a patient with AIMAH—a diffuse hyperplastic area and a <1-cm nodule from the right adrenal gland and a 3.5-cm nodule from the left adrenal gland—and found polyclonality in the two right lesions and monoclonality in the left lesion, suggestive of a transition from hyperplasia to autonomous adenoma-like growth in larger nodules [99]. All three studies concur that ACCs are more often monoclonal, adrenal hyperplasia is more often polyclonal, and ACAs can be either monoclonal or polyclonal. Polyclonality favors the idea that the tumor developed from a group of cells under the common stimulus of a growth factor, while monoclonality suggests that it developed from a single genetically aberrant cell. The presence of monoclonal and polyclonal ACAs could be a result of either different pathological mechanisms or different stages of a common multistep process. It has been suggested that progression to a monoclonal tumor could occur as a result of a first event that initiates the growth of a polyclonal or partially monoclonal tumor with the maintenance of a normal steroid secretory pattern, while a second event would confer a growth advantage in a selected clone of cells, with a concomitant loss of differentiated functions and an aberrant steroid secretory pattern [98].


    COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION ANALYSIS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a powerful tool for detecting genetic aberrations in tumors, and DNA copy losses identified on CGH have been shown to correlate with LOH studies on the subchromosomal level. CGH analyses of ACAs and ACCs have identified clear differences between the two groups [101104]. There were more copy number changes in ACCs than in ACAs, with a mean number of 7.6–14 changes in ACCs versus 1.1–2 changes in ACAs [102, 103]. Smaller ACAs were less likely to have genetic abnormalities, and chromosomal changes occurred with increasing frequency with increasing tumor size. In ACCs, the number of genetic changes also increased with increasing tumor size [101103]. The CGH data support the theory of an adenoma-to-carcinoma progression because there are more chromosomal changes in ACCs than in ACAs and the number of these changes increases with increasing tumor size.


    LOH ANALYSIS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
LOH analysis has been used to study chromosomal loci that have been linked to familial syndromes associated with ACTs. Numerous LOH studies have shown that LOH of 17p13 [63, 105, 106] (LFS), 11p15 [62, 63, 105] (BWS), 11q13 [73, 74, 107] (MEN1), 17q22–24 [76] (CNC), and 2p16 [107] (also CNC) tends to occur more frequently in sporadic ACCs than in ACAs (Table 2). Some of these studies have also shown the absence of mutations in the genes involved with hereditary tumor syndromes, suggesting that there are other tumor suppressor genes within these loci that are involved in the pathogenesis of sporadic ACCs. However, putative tumor suppressor genes that could play a role in tumorigenesis have yet to be elucidated.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Summary and evidence of genes involved in sporadic ACTs

 

    CURRENT MOLECULAR MARKERS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Several studies have assessed the use of IHC molecular markers in discriminating ACCs from ACAs. The markers studied have included IGF2, Ki-67/MIB1, p53, murine double minute 2, p21, p27, cyclin D1, Bcl-2, topoisomerase II{alpha}, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu, E-cadherin, and the retinoblastoma gene product [108112]. Many of these molecular markers, however, lack specificity to achieve discrimination between ACCs and ACAs.

The utility of IGF2 and MIB1 (a mouse monoclonal antibody that recognizes a formalin-fixation resistant epitope on the cell proliferation-associated antigen Ki-67) IHC in discriminating between ACCs and ACAs was assessed in one study. Tumors were classified as ACAs or ACCs based on Weiss [5], Hough [113], and van Slooten [114] scores. For IGF2 IHC, 21 of 22 ACAs were negative and 13 of 17 ACCs were positive, giving a specificity of 95.5% and a sensitivity of 76.5%. For MIB1, 21 of 22 ACAs were negative while 14 of 16 ACCs were positive, yielding a specificity of 95.5% and a sensitivity of 87.5%. Combining IGF2 and MIB1 IHC yielded a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95.5% in differentiating ACCs from ACAs [110].

Transcription factors have also been used as possible molecular markers that can differentiate ACCs from ACAs. A member of the nuclear receptor family of transcription factors, steroidogenic factor 1 (SF1) maps to 9q33.3. It has a key role in the development and function of the adrenal cortex [115]. A study on SF1 knockout mice demonstrated that these mice died on postnatal day 8 with severe adrenocortical insufficiency resulting from an absence of the adrenal glands [116]. SF1 heterozygous mice have also been found to develop adrenal insufficiency [117]. In CGH studies of 11 pediatric ACTs, James et al. [118] found that 9q34 showed amplification in 10 of the 11 ACTs. This finding was confirmed by Figueiredo et al. [119], who went on to use fluorescence in situ hybridization to confirm that there was a higher SF1 copy number in these tumors. Another study from this group also showed a higher SF1 copy number in eight of 10 pediatric ACTs. SF1 protein levels, however, were noted to be higher in all ACTs than in the normal adrenal cortex [120]. IHC with SF1 has not been shown to differentiate between ACCs and ACAs [121], but it is useful in distinguishing between primary ACC and metastasis from other sites [122].

GATA6 is from the GATA family of transcription factors, which is characterized by binding to the DNA consensus sequence (A/T)GATA(A/G). GATA6 plays a role in cellular maturation and differentiation [123]. GATA6 protein expression has been found to be significantly lower in ACCs than in ACAs on IHC. Accordingly, ACTs with Weiss scores of 4–9 had a significantly lower GATA6 level than ACTs with Weiss scores of 1–3 [121].

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a pivotal role in the regulation of both normal and tumor angiogenesis [124]. Angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth and metastasis [125]. VEGF has been found to be increased in the majority of cancers and is associated with a poorer outcome [126129]. One study assessed VEGF expression in 18 ACAs (Weiss score, 0), 12 transitional tumors (Weiss score, 1–3), and 13 ACCs (Weiss score >3) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and found that VEGF levels were significantly lower in ACAs and transitional tumors than in ACCs; these VEGF levels were unrelated to tumor weight. The VEGF levels for transitional tumors or ACCs that recurred were also higher than for those that did not recur [130]. Serum VEGF levels have also been assessed in patients with ACCs versus patients with ACAs, and they were not found to be significantly different between the two groups [131]. VEGF, however, as a molecular marker for ACC, has not been integrated into clinical practice.


    THE HUNT FOR NEW MOLECULAR MARKERS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
While IGF2 and MIB1 are promising diagnostic markers, they do not predict the clinical behavior of ACCs. Measuring LOH at 17p13 has been suggested as a new molecular marker with the capacity to predict tumor recurrence [63]. A combination of diagnostic and prognostic markers as adjuncts to the Weiss score could be the most feasible.

Microarray gene-expression analysis is a high-throughput technique that allows the simultaneous analysis of the expression of thousands of genes in a tissue. By comparing the gene-expression profiles of two different groups, such as ACCs and ACAs, it is possible to identify genes that are significantly upregulated or downregulated in one group relative to the other. The assumption is that these genes are in some way involved in the pathogenesis of these tumors. Overexpressed genes specific to ACCs have the potential to become therapeutic targets. At the time of writing this review, five microarray gene-expression profiling studies comparing ACCs with ACAs had been conducted, four specifically examining adult tumors and one examining pediatric tumors. A summary of the top genes identified to be significantly differentially expressed between ACCs and ACAs are listed in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Genes that were significantly differentially expressed in ACCs compared with ACAs in five microarray gene-profiling studies

 
Because of the low incidence of ACC, the majority of the microarray gene-expression profiling studies were performed using a small number of samples. This, in part, explains the disparity in genes identified across all of the studies. In addition, the different microarray platforms, different software and algorithms used to analyze the data, and different significance level cutoffs used also influence the gene lists. Contamination with normal adrenocortical, medullary, or stromal tissue could also account for differences in expression profiles. One gene, however, IGF2, was found to be overexpressed in all studies comparing ACCs and ACAs.

Several studies have noted the prognostic significance of molecular markers in ACCs [63, 68, 132]. In one study, an IGF2 gene–related cluster was identified that could select the subgroup of patients with ACCs who were at a high risk for recurrence and who would therefore benefit from adjuvant therapy [68]. This IGF2 gene–related cluster contained eight genes. Ninety percent of tumors with low expression of the IGF2 gene–related cluster were ACAs, while 75% of tumors with high expression of these genes were ACCs. In contrast a 14-gene steroidogenesis cluster could identify ACAs with high accuracy. Analyzing a subgroup of 40 tumors with follow-up data showed that either the IGF2 or steroidogenesis cluster of genes alone was not as effective as the Weiss score in terms of predicting malignancy and postoperative recurrence [68]. Another study found that LOH of the 17p13 locus in a cohort of 96 localized ACTs was a strong predictor of a shorter disease-free survival time, with a relative risk of 21.5 by multivariate analysis [63]. Volante et al. [132] studied the protein expression of matrix metalloproteinase type 2 (MMP2), also known as gelatinase A, by IHC in a cohort of 50 ACCs and 50 ACAs. They showed that MMP2 was detected in one of 50 (2%) ACAs and 37 of 50 (74%) ACCs (p < .001). MMP2 protein expression in ACCs was focal in two thirds of cases and diffuse in the remainder. It was also noted that more diffuse expression of MMP2 in ACCs was associated with shorter overall and disease-free survival times [132]. Interestingly, Kjellman et al. [133] assessed MMP2 mRNA in 16 ACCs and 14 ACAs by an mRNA in situ hybridization technique and found that 13 of 16 (81%) ACCs and one of 14 (7%) ACAs expressed MMP2 mRNA. However, the MMP2 mRNA was actually found in surrounding stromal tissue and not in the neoplastic cell itself [133]. Serum levels of MMP2 have not been found to be useful in predicting either ACC or ACA [131].


    CONCLUSION
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Progress into the elucidation of the genes and pathways involved in the pathogenesis of ACC has been slow largely because of the rarity of this tumor. The TP53, IGF2, H19, p57kip2, and MEN1 genes are involved in adrenocortical carcinogenesis, as are the ACTH–cAMP–PKA and Wnt pathways. CGH and LOH studies, however, have implicated the involvement of many chromosomal regions in which oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes have yet to be identified. Further work is therefore needed to better understand the pathogenesis of ACCs.


    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Conception/design: Patsy S. H. Soon, Kerrie L. McDonald, Bruce G. Robinson, Stan B. Sidhu

Collection/assembly of data: Patsy S. H. Soon

Data analysis and interpretation: Patsy S. H. Soon

Manuscript writing: Patsy S. H. Soon, Kerrie L. McDonald, Bruce G. Robinson, Stan B. Sidhu

Final approval of manuscript: Patsy S. H. Soon, Kerrie L. McDonald, Bruce G. Robinson, Stan B. Sidhu


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
P. S. H. Soon is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, New South Wales Cancer Institute and Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. The authors would like to thank Dr. Diana Benn for her critical review of the manuscript.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Molecular Aspects of ACCs
 Genetics of Sporadic ACTs
 The Guanine Nucleotide-Binding...
 Signaling Pathways in ACTs
 Clonal Analysis of ACTs
 Comparative Genomic...
 LOH Analysis
 Current Molecular Markers in...
 The Hunt for New...
 Conclusion
 Author Contributions
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Abecassis M, McLoughlin MJ, Langer B et al. Serendipitous adrenal masses: Prevalence, significance, and management. Am J Surg 1985;149:783–788.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G et al. Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest 2006;29:298–302.[Medline]
  3. NIH state-of-the-science statement on management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma"). NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002;19:1–25.[Medline]
  4. Aubert S, Wacrenier A, Leroy X et al. Weiss system revisited: A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 49 adrenocortical tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:1612–1619.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Weiss LM. Comparative histologic study of 43 metastasizing and nonmetastasizing adrenocortical tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 1984;8:163–169.[Medline]
  6. Weiss LM, Medeiros LJ, Vickery AL Jr. Pathologic features of prognostic significance in adrenocortical carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1989;13:202–206.[Medline]
  7. DeLellis RA LR, Heitz PU, Eng C. Pathology and Genetics: Tumours of Endocrine Organs. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press, 2004.
  8. Klibanski A, Stephen AE, Greene MF et al. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Case 36–2006. A 35-year-old pregnant woman with new hypertension. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2237–2245.[Free Full Text]
  9. Pohlink C, Tannapfe A, Eichfeld U et al. Does tumor heterogeneity limit the use of the Weiss criteria in the evaluation of adrenocortical tumors? J Endocrinol Invest 2004;27:565–569.[Medline]
  10. Shen WT, Sturgeon C, Duh QY. From incidentaloma to adrenocortical carcinoma: The surgical management of adrenal tumors. J Surg Oncol 2005;89:186–192.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Allolio B, Fassnacht M. Adrenocortical carcinoma: Clinical update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:2027–2037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kopf D, Goretzki PE, Lehnert H. Clinical management of malignant adrenal tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2001;127:143–155.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Iino K, Oki Y, Sasano H. A case of adrenocortical carcinoma associated with recurrence after laparoscopic surgery. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2000;53:243–248.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ushiyama T, Suzuki K, Kageyama S et al. A case of Cushing's syndrome due to adrenocortical carcinoma with recurrence 19 months after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. J Urol 1997;157:2239.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Schlamp A, Hallfeldt K, Mueller-Lisse U et al. Recurrent adrenocortical carcinoma after laparoscopic resection. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2007;3:191–195; quiz 1 p following 195.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Terzolo M, Angeli A, Fassnacht M et al. Adjuvant mitotane treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2372–2380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Crucitti F, Bellantone R, Ferrante A et al. The Italian Registry for Adrenal Cortical Carcinoma: Analysis of a multiinstitutional series of 129 patients. The ACC Italian Registry Study Group. Surgery 1996;119:161–170.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Icard P, Goudet P, Charpenay C et al. Adrenocortical carcinomas: Surgical trends and results of a 253-patient series from the French Association of Endocrine Surgeons study group. World J Surg 2001;25:891–897.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Wooten MD, King DK. Adrenal cortical carcinoma. Epidemiology and treatment with mitotane and a review of the literature. Cancer 1993;72:3145–3155.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Fassnacht M, Hahner S, Polat B et al. Efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy of the tumor bed on local recurrence of adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:4501–4504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ahlman H, Khorram-Manesh A, Jansson S et al. Cytotoxic treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. World J Surg 2001;25:927–933.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Li FP, Fraumeni JF Jr. Soft-tissue sarcomas, breast cancer, and other neoplasms. A familial syndrome? Ann Intern Med 1969;71:747–752.[Medline]
  23. Hisada M, Garber JE, Fung CY et al. Multiple primary cancers in families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:606–611.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Varley JM, McGown G, Thorncroft M et al. Are there low-penetrance TP53 Alleles? Evidence from childhood adrenocortical tumors. Am J Hum Genet 1999;65:995–1006.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Bell DW, Varley JM, Szydlo TE et al. Heterozygous germ line hCHK2 mutations in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Science 1999;286:2528–2531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Bachinski LL, Olufemi SE, Zhou X et al. Genetic mapping of a third Li-Fraumeni syndrome predisposition locus to human chromosome 1q23. Cancer Res 2005;65:427–431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Maher ER, Reik W. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: Imprinting in clusters revisited. J Clin Invest 2000;105:247–252.[Medline]
  28. Nyström A, Cheetham JE, Engström W et al. Molecular analysis of patients with Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome. II. Paternally derived disomies of chromosome 11. Eur J Pediatr 1992;151:511–514.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Carney JA, Gordon H, Carpenter PC et al. The complex of myxomas, spotty pigmentation, and endocrine overactivity. Medicine (Baltimore) 1985;64:270–283.[Medline]
  30. Carney JA, Hruska LS, Beauchamp GD et al. Dominant inheritance of the complex of myxomas, spotty pigmentation, and endocrine overactivity. Mayo Clin Proc 1986;61:165–172.[Medline]
  31. Stratakis CA, Kirschner LS, Carney JA. Carney complex: Diagnosis and management of the complex of spotty skin pigmentation, myxomas, endocrine overactivity, and schwannomas. Am J Med Genet 1998;80:183–185.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Groussin L, Cazabat L, Rene-Corail F et al. Adrenal pathophysiology: Lessons from the Carney complex. Horm Res 2005;64:132–139.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Kirschner LS, Carney JA, Pack SD et al. Mutations of the gene encoding the protein kinase A type I-alpha regulatory subunit in patients with the Carney complex. Nat Genet 2000;26:89–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Stratakis CA, Carney JA, Lin JP et al. Carney complex, a familial multiple neoplasia and lentiginosis syndrome. Analysis of 11 kindreds and linkage to the short arm of chromosome 2. J Clin Invest 1996;97:699–705.[Medline]
  35. Thakker RV. Multiple endocrine neoplasia—syndromes of the twentieth century. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:2617–2620.[Free Full Text]
  36. Barzon L, Pasquali C, Grigoletto C et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and adrenal lesions. J Urol 2001;166:24–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Skogseid B, Larsson C, Lindgren PG et al. Clinical and genetic features of adrenocortical lesions in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;75:76–81.[Abstract]
  38. Burgess JR, Harle RA, Tucker P et al. Adrenal lesions in a large kindred with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Arch Surg 1996;131:699–702.[Abstract]
  39. Waldmann J, Bartsch DK, Kann PH et al. Adrenal involvement in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: Results of 7 years prospective screening. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2007;392:437–443.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P et al. Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science 1997;276:404–407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Pannett AA, Thakker RV. Somatic mutations in MEN type 1 tumors, consistent with the Knudson "two-hit" hypothesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:4371–4374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Speiser PW, White PC. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 2003;349:776–788.[Free Full Text]
  43. Merke DP, Bornstein SR, Avila NA et al. NIH conference. Future directions in the study and management of congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:320–334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Merke DP, Bornstein SR. Congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Lancet 2005;365:2125–2136.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Jaresch S, Kornely E, Kley HK et al. Adrenal incidentaloma and patients with homozygous or heterozygous congenital adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992;74:685–689.[Abstract]
  46. Bauman A, Bauman CG. Virilizing adrenocortical carcinoma. Development in a patient with salt-losing congenital adrenal hyperplasia. JAMA 1982;248:3140–3141.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Merke DP, Bornstein SR, Braddock D et al. Adrenal lymphocytic infiltration and adrenocortical tumors in a patient with 21-hydroxylase deficiency. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1121–1122.[Free Full Text]
  48. Hollstein M, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B et al. p53 mutations in human cancers. Science 1991;253:49–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Levine AJ, Momand J, Finlay CA