This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: rHuEPO and Treatment Outcomes: The Preclinical Experience eLetters: Submit a response to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints/Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ludwig, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ludwig, H.

rHuEPO and Treatment Outcomes: The Preclinical Experience

Department of Medicine and Medical Oncology, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria

Correspondence: Heinz Ludwig, M.D., Department of Medicine and Medical Oncology, 1st Medical Department/Oncology, Wilhelminenspital, Montleartstrasse 37, A-1171 Vienna, Austria. Telephone: 43-1-49-150-2101; Fax: 43-1-49-150-2109; e-mail: Heinz.Ludwig{at}weinkav.at

The presence of hypoxic areas is a common feature of solid tumors and has been associated with decreased sensitivity of the tumors to radiation therapy and oxygen-dependent chemotherapeutic agents, as well as worsened outcomes, including survival. Anemia is also common in cancer patients and is believed to contribute to tumor hypoxia. Thus, the rationale exists for administering recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, epoetin alfa) in an effort to increase hemoglobin levels, correct anemia, and thereby possibly increase the sensitivity of tumors to standard cancer treatment and improve patient outcomes. The results of several preclinical studies that examined the impact of anemia prevention by rHuEPO on tumor sensitivity to radiation therapy in rodent models of cancer showed that induction of anemia increased hypoxia in tumor cells and that correction of anemia with rHuEPO could improve tumor oxygenation. Further studies in rodent models showed significantly delayed tumor growth in both irradiated mice and irradiated rats treated with rHuEPO. In those studies, the increased radiosensitivity observed was believed to be due to improved tumor oxygenation following the correction of anemia. Similarly, enhancements in chemosensitivity were found in rHuEPO-treated rodent models. In the chemosensitivity studies, as in the radiosensitivity studies, the therapeutic benefit obtained was believed to reflect improved tumor oxygenation subsequent to an rHuEPO-related increase in oxygen availability. One study evaluated the potential biologic effects of epoetin alfa on tumor progression using murine myeloma models (MOPC-315 and 5T33 MM). Treatment of MOPC-315 tumor-bearing mice with epoetin alfa induced complete tumor regression in 30%–60% of mice. Regression was found to be tumor specific, and the effect of epoetin alfa was shown to be T-cell mediated. Additionally, epoetin alfa administration prolonged survival and reduced morbidity and mortality in the 5T33 MM tumor model. Those investigators suggested that epoetin alfa may have antitumor activity in addition to its hematopoietic effects. Overall, these preclinical findings suggest that correction of anemia by rHuEPO can increase tumor sensitivity to both radiation therapy and chemotherapy and that epoetin alfa may exert an immunomodulatory effect in multiple myeloma.

Key Words. Anemia • Cancer • Epoetin alfa • Hemoglobin • Outcomes • Preclinical • rHuEPO • Tumor hypoxia • Survival

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. R. LaMontagne, J. Butler, D. J. Marshall, J. Tullai, Z. Gechtman, C. Hall, A. Meshaw, and F. X. Farrell Recombinant epoetins do not stimulate tumor growth in erythropoietin receptor-positive breast carcinoma models. Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2006; 5(2): 347 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Hudis and S. Van Belle Introduction: Examining the Potential Impact of Anemia Treatment on Clinical Outcomes in Anemic Cancer Patients Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(suppl_5): 1 - 3. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Blackwell, P. Gascon, G. Sigounas, and L. Jolliffe rHuEPO and Improved Treatment Outcomes: Potential Modes of Action Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(suppl_5): 41 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ludwig, C. A. Hudis, G. Goss, and B. Leyland-Jones Epoetin Alfa: Future Directions and Future Research Oncologist, November 1, 2004; 9(suppl_5): 70 - 73. [Full Text] [PDF]