| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Correspondence: Charles J. Dunton, M.D., Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19141, USA. Telephone: 215-456-8386; Fax: 215-456-2386; e-mail: duntonc{at}einstein.edu
Recognition of recurrent ovarian cancer as a disease with significant secondary responses and remissions has led to an increase in the need for oncologists to plan for the long-term therapy of patients. However, many of the currently available front-line and salvage agents used in advanced ovarian cancer are associated with cumulative and/or irreversible toxicities that pose challenges in long-term planning. The irreversible effects associated with some of these therapies may render patients less tolerant to subsequent treatments and lead to a cycle of diminishing treatment options with each remission and disease relapse. Additionally, the potential for patients to experience cumulative toxicity must be carefully weighed against the goals of prolonging the disease-free interval and improving patient quality of life. A number of agents are available in the treatment armamentarium (platinum, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, etoposide, liposomal doxorubicin, and topotecan), many, but not all of which are associated with cumulative toxicity. For instance, cumulative neurotoxicity associated with cisplatin as first-line therapy may diminish the option for retreatment with platinum at first relapse. In contrast, the main toxicity associated with topotecan is noncumulative, manageable myelosuppression. In this review, the major toxicities associated with the predominant chemotherapy agents used in advanced ovarian cancer are discussed along with selected management approaches in the context of long-term treatment planning and sequencing.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. K. Armstrong, D. Spriggs, J. Levin, R. Poulin, and S. Lane Hematologic Safety and Tolerability of Topotecan in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer and Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Integrated Analysis Oncologist, October 1, 2005; 10(9): 686 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Eckardt Emerging Role of Weekly Topotecan in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer Oncologist, December 1, 2004; 9(suppl_6): 25 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Armstrong Novel Therapies in Ovarian Cancer Management: An Update on the Role of Topotecan Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(90005): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Armstrong Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: Challenges and Management Strategies for a Chronic Disease Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(90005): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Morris and A. Munkarah Alternate Dosing Schedules for Topotecan in the Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(90005): 29 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Coleman Emerging Role of Topotecan in Front-Line Treatment of Carcinoma of the Ovary Oncologist, October 1, 2002; 7(90005): 46 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| THE ONCOLOGIST | STEM CELLS | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |