help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverstein, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverstein, M. J.
The Oncologist, Vol. 3, No. 2, 94-103, April 1998
© 1998 AlphaMed Press

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Controversial Issues

Melvin J. Silverstein

The Breast Center*, Van Nuys, California, USA

Correspondence: Melvin J. Silverstein, M.D., The Breast Center, *A Salick Health Care Subsidiary, 14624 Sherman Way, Sixth Floor, Van Nuys, California 91405, USA. Telephone: 818-787-9911; Fax: 818-787-8853; e-mail: melsilver9{at}aol.com

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a heterogeneous group of lesions with diverse malignant potential and a range of controversial treatment options. It is the most rapidly growing subgroup in the breast cancer family, with more than 36,000 new cases diagnosed in the United States during 1997. Most new cases are nonpalpable and discovered mammographically. In this overview, a variety of controversial issues are discussed, including: whether or not DCIS should be considered cancer, the fallacy of grouping lesions by their pathologic architecture, an algorithm to aid in the complex treatment-selection process, the profound importance of excision margins, and the outcome following invasive local recurrence, in terms of distant recurrence and mortality. Current approaches to DCIS are based on morphology rather than etiology. In all likelihood, genetic changes precede morphologic evidence of malignant transformation. Medicine must learn how to recognize these genetic changes, exploit them, and, in the future, prevent them.

Key Words. DCIS • Ductal carcinoma in situ • Noninvasive breast cancer • Intraductal breast cancer




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S. J. Katz, P. M. Lantz, N. K. Janz, A. Fagerlin, K. Schwartz, L. Liu, D. Deapen, B. Salem, I. Lakhani, and M. Morrow
Patterns and Correlates of Local Therapy for Women With Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 23(13): 3001 - 3007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. Shim, M. L. Gauthier, D. Sudilovsky, K. Mantei, K. L. Chew, D. H. Moore, I. Cha, T. D. Tlsty, and L. J. Esserman
Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression Is Related to Nuclear Grade in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and Is Increased in Its Normal Adjacent Epithelium
Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2347 - 2350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 1998 by AlphaMed Press.