help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Moorsel, C. J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Pinedo, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Moorsel, C. J.A.
Right arrow Articles by Pinedo, H. M.
The Oncologist, Vol. 2, No. 3, 127–134, June 1997
© 1997 AlphaMed Press


REVIEW AND COMMENTARY

Gemcitabine: Future Prospects of Single-Agent and Combination Studies

Catharina J.A. van Moorsel, Godefridus J. Peters, Herbert M. Pinedo

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Godefridus J. Peters, Ph.D., Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Telephone: +31-20-444-2633; Fax: +31-20-444-3844.

ABSTRACT

Gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine, Gemzar) is a deoxycytidine analog with excellent antitumor activity against a number of solid tumors. Gemcitabine needs to be activated by deoxycytidine kinase and other kinases to its triphosphate, gemcitabine triphosphate, which can be incorporated into RNA and DNA. The latter effect is considered to be responsible for its antitumor effect and causes masked chain termination and inhibition of DNA repair. This effect may be of importance for combination with DNA interacting agents. In phase I trials daily, twice weekly, weekly and every two weeks schedules have been evaluated. At the weekly schedule of 1,000-1,250 mg/m2 significant antitumor activity was observed in bladder, breast, ovary, and pancreatic cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and small cell lung cancer of 31%, 33%, 22%, 11%, 22% and 27% total response rates, respectively. Gemcitabine also showed considerable improvement in clinical symptoms, while toxicity was not severe with mild myelosuppression. Due to its ability to inhibit DNA replication, combination studies were initiated with DNA damaging agents. For the various combinations with cisplatin in phase II studies on NSCLC, response rates varied from 42%-54%, with a median survival of generally more than 12 months. Also, combinations with taxanes, etoposide, doxorubicin and vindesin seem promising. Gemcitabine is an important agent for the management of several relatively chemoresistant cancer types, both with respect to antitumor activity and clinical benefit. Future research on combination studies deserves high priority considering the high response rates in NSCLC and bladder cancer.

Key Words. Gemcitabine • Cisplatin • Taxanes • Non-small cell lung cancer • Pancreatic cancer • Breast cancer • Antimetabolites • Deoxycytidine kinase




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. A. Veltkamp, J. H. Beijnen, and J. H.M. Schellens
Prolonged Versus Standard Gemcitabine Infusion: Translation of Molecular Pharmacology to New Treatment Strategy
Oncologist, March 1, 2008; 13(3): 261 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
T. Yeo, J Kintner, R Armand, R Perez, and L. Lewis
Sublethal concentrations of gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) alter mitochondrial ultrastructure and function without reducing mitochondrial DNA content in BxPC-3 human pancreatic carcinoma cells
Human and Experimental Toxicology, December 1, 2007; 26(12): 911 - 921.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. M. De Lange, C. J. van Groeningen, J. R. Kroep, A. Van Bochove, J. F. Snijders, G. J. Peters, H. M. Pinedo, and G. Giaccone
Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Ann. Onc., March 1, 2004; 15(3): 484 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
P. M. Fracasso, J. S. Rader, R. Govindan, T. J. Herzog, M. A. Arquette, A. Denes, D. G. Mutch, J. Picus, B. R. Tan, C. L. Fears, et al.
Phase I study of rubitecan and gemcitabine in patients with advanced malignancies
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2002; 13(11): 1819 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. R. Kroep, W. J. P. Loves, C. L. van der Wilt, E. Alvarez, I. Talianidis, E. Boven, B. J. M. Braakhuis, C. J. van Groeningen, H. M. Pinedo, and G. J. Peters
Pretreatment Deoxycytidine Kinase Levels Predict in Vivo Gemcitabine Sensitivity
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2002; 1(6): 371 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. H. Einhorn, M. J. Stender, and S. D. Williams
Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine in Refractory Germ Cell Tumors
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 1999; 17(2): 509 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Wang, J. Neuhard, and S. Eriksson
An Escherichia coli System Expressing Human Deoxyribonucleoside Salvage Enzymes for Evaluation of Potential Antiproliferative Nucleoside Analogs
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., October 1, 1998; 42(10): 2620 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 1997 by AlphaMed Press.