help button home button The Oncologist
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Oncologist, Vol. 13, No. suppl_2, 8-13, April 2008; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.13-S2-8
© 2008 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van den Abbeele, A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van den Abbeele, A. D.

The Lessons of GIST—PET and PET/CT: A New Paradigm for Imaging

Annick D. Van den Abbeele

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Key Words. Positron emission tomography • Computed tomography • Fluorodeoxyglucose • Gastrointestinal stromal tumor • Imatinib mesylate

Correspondence: Annick D. Van den Abbeele, M.D., Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. Telephone: 617-632-2595; Fax: 617-582-8574; e-mail: abbeele{at}dfci.harvard.edu

Disclosure: No potential conflicts of interest were reported by the authors, planners, reviewers, or staff managers of this article.

Traditional anatomic tumor response criteria are based on uni- or bidimensional changes in tumor size, and do not take into account changes in tumor metabolism, tumor density, or decrease in the number of intratumoral vessels. These changes are, however, all indicative of response to imatinib therapy in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). In these patients, metabolic responses seen on positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18FDG) have been shown to be closely related to clinical benefit. Furthermore, these metabolic changes precede by weeks or months significant decrease in tumor size on computed tomography (CT). Conversely, lack of metabolic response on FDG-PET indicates primary resistance to the drug and may help identify patients who would benefit from another therapy, while re-emergence of metabolic activity within tumor sites following a period of therapeutic response indicates secondary resistance to the drug. Newly proposed CT criteria using either no growth in tumor size or a combination of tumor density and size criteria have shown a close correlation with the predictive value results of FDG-PET. Thus, the integration of FDG-PET and CT, as in the combined hybrid PET/CT scanners now available, will not only optimize the evaluation of patients with GIST treated with molecularly targeted drugs, but may ultimately help shorten clinical trials, and accelerate drug development in this disease and other cancers as well.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. C. Jaffe
Response Assessment in Clinical Trials: Implications for Sarcoma Clinical Trial Design
Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(suppl_2): 14 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. M. Schuetze, L. H. Baker, R. S. Benjamin, and R. Canetta
Selection of Response Criteria for Clinical Trials of Sarcoma Treatment
Oncologist, April 1, 2008; 13(suppl_2): 32 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS


Copyright © 2008 by AlphaMed Press.