help button home button The Oncologist http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/misc/eLetters.shtml
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Oncologist, Vol. 12, No. 1, 72-78, January 2007; doi:10.1634/theoncologist.12-1-72
© 2007 AlphaMed Press

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Reprints/Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coleman, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Herzog, T. J.

Gynecologic Oncology

Early Changes in CA125 After Treatment with Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin or Topotecan Do Not Always Reflect Best Response in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients

Robert L. Colemana, Alan Gordonb, James Barterc, Steven Sund, Wayne Rackoffd, Thomas J. Herzoge

a The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; b Arizona Gynecologic Oncology, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; c Women’s Health Specialists, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; d Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., Raritan, New Jersey, USA; e Columbia University, New York, New York, USA

Key Words. CA125 • Biomarkers • Ovarian cancer • Response to therapy • Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin • Topotecan

Correspondence: Robert L. Coleman, M.D., 1155 Herman Pressler Dr., CPB 6.3271, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. Telephone: 713-745-3357; Fax: 713-792-7586; e-mail: rcoleman{at}mdanderson.org

Purpose. To examine early changes in CA125 relative to objective response in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or topotecan and to compare the CA125 trends between the two chemotherapeutics.

Patients and Methods. Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, all of whom had measurable or evaluable disease, were randomized to receive 50 mg/m2 PLD every 28 days (n = 239) or 1.5 mg/m2 topotecan for 5 days every 21 days (n = 235) as part of a previously reported multicenter study. CA125 measurements were obtained prior to therapy and with each cycle of administration. Assessable patients underwent radiographic evaluation for response after two cycles of therapy. Objective responses were compared to trends in CA125 values at the end of cycles 1 and 2. CA125 changes were categorized as baseline (±10%), ± 10%–25% variance, and > 25% variance.

Results. Among patients treated with PLD, 50% of complete responders (CR) and 41% of partial responders (PR) had increases in CA125 from baseline to cycle 1. Increases in CA125 were also seen in topotecan-treated patients; however, fewer patients had increases (20% and 8%, respectively). Overall, 15% of responding patients (CR + PR) receiving PLD and 6% receiving topotecan had elevated CA125 after two cycles of therapy. For those patients achieving a partial response, 19% of PLD-treated patients and 8% of topotecan-treated patients had CA125 levels above baseline at cycle 2.

Conclusions. Considerable intrapatient variation in CA125 values is present among responding patients. Early increases in CA125 may not predict ultimate outcome, especially in PLD-treated patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
G. Ferrandina, M. Ludovisi, D. Lorusso, S. Pignata, E. Breda, A. Savarese, P. Del Medico, L. Scaltriti, D. Katsaros, D. Priolo, et al.
Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Progressive or Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 890 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE ONCOLOGIST STEM CELLS CME ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS
http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/subscriptions/etoc.dtl

Copyright © 2007 by AlphaMed Press.