| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
a Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; b Consultants in Blood Disorders and Cancer, Louisville, Kentucky, USA; c Upstate Carolina CCOP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, USA; d Northeast Alabama Regional Medical Center, Anniston, Alabama, USA
Key Words. Small cell lung cancer • Chemotherapy • Randomized study • Nonplatinum doublet
Correspondence: F. Anthony Greco, M.D., Sarah Cannon Research Institute, 250 25th Avenue North, Suite 110, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA. Telephone: 615-329-7274; Fax: 615-986-0029; e-mail fgreco{at}tnonc.com
Purpose. To compare the combination of paclitaxel (Taxol®; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, http://www.bms.com) and topotecan (Hycamtin®; Glaxo SmithKline, Philadelphia, http://www.gsk.com) with paclitaxel, carboplatin (Paraplatin®; Bristol-Myers Squibb), and etoposide (Etopophos®, VePesid®; Bristol-Myers Squibb) in patients with previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Patients and Methods. In this phase II trial, 120 patients were randomly allocated to receive either topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 2, and 3) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 i.v. day 1) every 21 days orpaclitaxe l (200mg/m2 i.v. day 1), carboplatin (area under the concentrationtime curve 6 i.v. day 1), and etoposide (50 mg/100 mg alternating daily by mouth days 110) every 21 days, each regimen for a maximum of eight cycles. The primary end points were objective response rate and time to progression.
Results. The paclitaxelcarboplatinetoposide combination produced a significantly higher overall response rate (78% versus 48%), longer median time to progression (7.6 months versus 5.5 months), and greater number of patients free from progression at 1 year (14% versus 8%) compared with paclitaxel plus topotecan. There was no difference in overall survival. Toxicities were similar in the two treatment arms.
Conclusions. The paclitaxelcarboplatinetoposide combination produced a superior overall response rate and time to progression in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer compared with paclitaxel plus topotecan. The platinum compounds continue to be a necessary component of the initial therapy for these patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Socinski, C. Weissman, L. L. Hart, J. T. Beck, J. K. Choksi, J. P. Hanson, D. Prager, M. J. Monberg, Z. Ye, and C. K. Obasaju Randomized Phase II Trial of Pemetrexed Combined With Either Cisplatin or Carboplatin in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2006; 24(30): 4840 - 4847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| THE ONCOLOGIST | STEM CELLS | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |