| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regulatory Issues |
Division of Oncology Drug Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA
Correspondence: Correspondence: Martin H. Cohen, M.D., Food and Drug Administration, HFD-150 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, USA. Fax: 301-594-0499; e-mail: cohenma{at}cder.fda.gov
ABSTRACT
On August 19, 2004, pemetrexed for injection (Alimta®; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, http://www.lilly.com) received accelerated approval as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had received prior chemotherapy.
Approval was primarily based on a single, controlled, unblinded trial. Five hundred seventy-one protocol-eligible patients were randomized to receive either pemetrexed or docetaxel (Taxotere®; Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, http://www.aventispharmaus.com). The primary efficacy end point was overall survival. The median survival times were 8.3 months in the pemetrexed arm and 7.9 months in the docetaxel arm. Neither superiority nor noninferiority for overall survival could be demonstrated, the latter because a reliable and consistent survival effect of docetaxel could not be estimated and because of significant crossover of pemetrexed-treated patients to docetaxel after tumor progression. Comparable response rates, 9.1% for pemetrexed and 8.8% for docetaxel, times to progressive disease, and progression-free survival times supported the conclusion that an effect of pemetrexed on survival was reasonably likely, however.
In addition, pemetrexed was felt to have a more favorable safety profile than docetaxel. Of greatest importance, pemetrexed caused significantly less neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, neutropenic infections, and need for granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. E. Stinchcombe and M. A. Socinski Gefitinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Does It Deserve a Second Chance? Oncologist, September 1, 2008; 13(9): 933 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Iwakiri, M. Sonobe, S. Nagai, T. Hirata, H. Wada, and R. Miyahara Expression Status of Folate Receptor {alpha} Is Significantly Correlated with Prognosis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 15(3): 889 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Stinchcombe and M. A. Socinski Considerations for Second-Line Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Oncologist, January 1, 2008; 13(suppl_1): 28 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Malempati, H. S. Nicholson, J. M. Reid, S. M. Blaney, A. M. Ingle, M. Krailo, L. C. Stork, A. S. Melemed, R. McGovern, S. Safgren, et al. Phase I Trial and Pharmacokinetic Study of Pemetrexed in Children With Refractory Solid Tumors: The Children's Oncology Group J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2007; 25(12): 1505 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chattopadhyay, R. G. Moran, and I. D. Goldman Pemetrexed: biochemical and cellular pharmacology, mechanisms, and clinical applications Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 404 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Fanucchi, F. V. Fossella, R. Belt, R. Natale, P. Fidias, D. P. Carbone, R. Govindan, L. E. Raez, F. Robert, M. Ribeiro, et al. Randomized Phase II Study of Bortezomib Alone and Bortezomib in Combination With Docetaxel in Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2006; 24(31): 5025 - 5033. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rahman and R. M. White Cytotoxic Anticancer Agents and Renal Impairment Study: The Challenge Remains J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 24(4): 533 - 536. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chattopadhyay, R. Zhao, S. A. Krupenko, N. Krupenko, and I. D. Goldman The inverse relationship between reduced folate carrier function and Pemetrexed activity in a human colon cancer cell line. Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2006; 5(2): 438 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| THE ONCOLOGIST | STEM CELLS | CME | ALPHAMED PRESS JOURNALS |